vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC (FEIM) and NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (NEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.6M vs $17.1M, roughly 1.4× FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC). FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC runs the higher net margin — 10.5% vs -677.3%, a 687.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs 8.3%). Over the past eight quarters, FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC's revenue compounded faster (11.8% CAGR vs 8.9%).
Ultra Electronics Holdings is a British defence and security company. It was listed on the London Stock Exchange and was a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index until it was acquired by Cobham, which is itself owned by Advent International.
New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership is a real estate investment entity that owns, operates and manages residential and commercial properties primarily across the U.S. New England region. Its core assets include multifamily apartments, mixed-use properties and small commercial spaces, serving tenants across Massachusetts, New Hampshire and adjacent states, delivering steady returns to unitholders via rental income and property value growth.
FEIM vs NEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.1M | $23.6M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $-1.4M |
| Gross Margin | 38.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.0% | 14.0% |
| Net Margin | 10.5% | -677.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.3% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.1% | -133.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $17.1M | $23.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | $23.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.0M | $21.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $20.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.8M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1M | $20.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.6M | $20.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.7M | $19.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $634.0K | $-521.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2M | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.4M | $3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7M | $4.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.0K | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | 14.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 20.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.4% | 33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | 30.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.5% | 32.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | 32.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.0% | 32.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.4% | 28.9% |
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | -677.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | -2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.0% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 81.4% | 18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.8% | 20.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 17.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.60 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.28 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.25 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.28 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.0M | $26.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $531.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $58.5M | — |
| Total Assets | $92.3M | $505.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $26.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5M | $13.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7M | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.2M | $15.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.3M | $13.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.7M | $28.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $531.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $514.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $514.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $407.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $408.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $409.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $410.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $410.7M |
| Q4 25 | $58.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $92.3M | $505.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $93.2M | $492.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.7M | $494.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.4M | $385.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.8M | $393.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.3M | $387.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.3M | $383.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.7M | $381.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-523.0K | $27.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.29× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-5.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-523.0K | $27.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-155.0K | $12.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.6M | $5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8M | $31.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.5M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5M | $5.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2M | $6.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $385.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-786.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | -6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -20.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.29× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.83× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.05× | 3.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.24× | 1.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.44× | 7.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.60× | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.85× | 1.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.36× | 1.77× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FEIM
| POC Revenue | $14.8M | 86% |
| POT Revenue | $2.3M | 13% |
NEN
Segment breakdown not available.
