vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of F5, Inc. (FFIV) and SILICOM LTD. (SILC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
F5, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($822.5M vs $61.9M, roughly 13.3× SILICOM LTD.). F5, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 21.9% vs -18.5%, a 40.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, F5, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.3% vs 6.6%). F5, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($149.5M vs $-3.3M).
F5, Inc. is an American technology company specializing in application security, multi-cloud management, online fraud prevention, application delivery networking (ADN), application availability and performance, and network security, access, and authorization.
Silicom Ltd. is a publicly traded company, headquartered in Israel, that specializes in the design, manufacture and marketing of connectivity solutions for a range of servers and server-based systems. Its shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Market and on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. Silicom is a member of the RAD Group family of companies.
FFIV vs SILC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $822.5M | $61.9M |
| Net Profit | $180.1M | $-11.5M |
| Gross Margin | 81.5% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 26.0% | -19.8% |
| Net Margin | 21.9% | -18.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.3% | 6.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 8.2% | 16.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.10 | $-2.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $822.5M | $61.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $810.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $780.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $731.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $766.5M | $58.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $746.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $695.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $681.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $180.1M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $145.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $166.4M | $-13.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $165.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $144.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $119.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 81.5% | 30.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 82.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 81.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 81.7% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 80.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 80.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 79.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 26.0% | -19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.8% | -22.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 21.9% | -18.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.7% | -23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.10 | $-2.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.25 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.25 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.48 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.82 | $-2.28 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.79 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.44 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.00 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $42.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.5B | $117.5M |
| Total Assets | $6.3B | $152.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $72.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $935.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $903.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $117.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $127.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | — |
| Q4 25 | $6.3B | $152.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $150.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $159.2M | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $149.5M | $-3.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.2% | -5.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $861.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $159.2M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $208.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $282.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $256.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $202.8M | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $246.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $159.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $221.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $149.5M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $273.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $246.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $194.7M | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $153.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $212.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 18.2% | -5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.4% | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.09× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.76× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.22× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.10× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.86× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FFIV
| Services | $412.2M | 50% |
| Products | $410.3M | 50% |
SILC
Segment breakdown not available.
