vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of First Foundation Inc. (FFWM) and Information Services Group Inc. (III). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Information Services Group Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($61.2M vs $48.4M, roughly 1.3× First Foundation Inc.). Information Services Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs -97.9%, a 102.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, First Foundation Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (421.7% vs 5.9%). Information Services Group Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($4.3M vs $-35.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Information Services Group Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-2.4% CAGR vs -2.7%).
John B. Lacson Colleges Foundation (Bacolod), Inc. is a private maritime college in Bacolod, Negros Occidental, Philippines.
EBSCO Information Services, headquartered in Ipswich, Massachusetts, is a division of EBSCO Industries Inc., a private company headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. EBSCO provides products and services to libraries of many types around the world. Its products include EBSCONET, a complete e-resource management system, and EBSCOhost, which supplies a fee-based online research service with 375 full-text databases, a collection of 600,000-plus ebooks, subject indexes, point-of-care medical refere...
FFWM vs III — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $48.4M | $61.2M |
| Net Profit | $-8.0M | $2.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 44.8% |
| Operating Margin | -97.5% | 8.4% |
| Net Margin | -97.9% | 4.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 421.7% | 5.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 43.0% | -14.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.09 | $0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $48.4M | $61.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.6M | $62.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.4M | $61.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.4M | $59.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.3M | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.2M | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.5M | $64.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.1M | $64.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.0M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-146.3M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.7M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9M | $1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-14.1M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-82.2M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $793.0K | $-3.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 44.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 42.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 40.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 36.1% |
| Q4 25 | -97.5% | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -92.7% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.1% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -247.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1276.7% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.2% | -3.7% |
| Q4 25 | -97.9% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -230.1% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.0% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -152.2% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -896.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | -5.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.09 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.78 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.08 | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.24 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.23 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.05 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.6B | $28.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $912.6M | $94.7M |
| Total Assets | $11.9B | $211.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $28.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $28.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $25.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $20.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $14.0M |
| Q4 25 | $912.6M | $94.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $917.9M | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $94.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $95.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $96.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $96.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $933.2M | $95.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $928.7M | $95.6M |
| Q4 25 | $11.9B | $211.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9B | $213.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.6B | $200.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.6B | $202.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.6B | $204.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.4B | $227.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7B | $235.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.6B | $234.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-31.9M | $5.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-35.2M | $4.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -72.8% | 7.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.94× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-45.9M | $25.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-31.9M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.2M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.3M | $11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-552.0K | $978.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.7M | $6.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.1M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.2M | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-35.2M | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6M | $9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.7M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | $141.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.4M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.4M | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.4M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | $1.3M |
| Q4 25 | -72.8% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.5% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -32.4% | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -123.5% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 146.2% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.6% | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.4% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.5% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.62× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.46× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.08× | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.96× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.09× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
