vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. (FG) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Roper Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.8B, roughly 1.2× F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs 7.3%, a 8.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.2% vs 11.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Roper Technologies's revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs 6.1%).
F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. is a public company headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa. It primarily provides annuities, life insurance, and pension buyout services. The company was founded in 1959.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
FG vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $128.0M | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | 7.3% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.2% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -60.9% | 53.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.97 | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $908.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $128.0M | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.0M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.0M | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $327.0M | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.0M | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $203.0M | $337.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.3% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.3% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.4% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.3% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.97 | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.85 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.26 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.53 | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.08 | $3.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.55 | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.5B | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.2B | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.8B | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $98.4B | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.47× | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5B | $269.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $251.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.8B | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7B | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $98.4B | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.1B | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.8B | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.0B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.0B | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.1B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.5B | $29.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.47× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.55× | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.56× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.2B | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 9.13× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.0M | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $956.0M | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $755.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $384.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.13× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.94× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.50× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.04× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.20× | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
