vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. (FG) and Take-Two Interactive (TTWO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.7B, roughly 1.0× Take-Two Interactive). F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.3% vs -5.5%, a 12.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Take-Two Interactive posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.9% vs 13.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Take-Two Interactive's revenue compounded faster (10.2% CAGR vs 6.1%).
F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. is a public company headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa. It primarily provides annuities, life insurance, and pension buyout services. The company was founded in 1959.
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. is an American video game holding company based in New York City founded by Ryan Brant in September 1993.
FG vs TTWO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.7B |
| Net Profit | $128.0M | $-92.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | -2.3% |
| Net Margin | 7.3% | -5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.2% | 24.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -60.9% | 25.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.97 | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $908.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $128.0M | $-92.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.0M | $-133.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.0M | $-11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $-3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $327.0M | $-125.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.0M | $-365.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $203.0M | $-262.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $115.0M | $-2.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | 55.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 55.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 62.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 55.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 53.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 57.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 33.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -238.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -13.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -193.9% |
| Q4 25 | 7.3% | -5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | -7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.3% | -235.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | -9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.4% | -27.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.3% | -19.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.3% | -207.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.97 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.85 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.26 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $-21.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.53 | $-0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.08 | $-2.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.55 | $-1.52 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.88 | $-17.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.5B | $2.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.8B | $3.5B |
| Total Assets | $98.4B | $10.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.47× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5B | $879.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | $776.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.8B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $5.7B |
| Q4 25 | $98.4B | $10.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.1B | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.8B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.0B | $9.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.0B | $12.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.1B | $13.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.5B | $12.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $74.4B | $12.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.49× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.2B | $305.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $236.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 13.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 9.13× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $487.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $305.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.0M | $128.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $-44.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $956.0M | $279.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $-128.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $-191.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $-8.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $236.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $96.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-69.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $224.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-48.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-165.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-226.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-55.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -12.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | 9.13× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.94× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.50× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.04× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.20× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.34× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.