vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FEDERATED HERMES, INC. (FHI) and Sensata Technologies Holding plc (ST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sensata Technologies Holding plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($934.8M vs $479.0M, roughly 2.0× FEDERATED HERMES, INC.). FEDERATED HERMES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 20.1% vs 9.3%, a 10.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sensata Technologies Holding plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.6% vs -0.8%). Over the past eight quarters, FEDERATED HERMES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (9.1% CAGR vs -5.0%).
Federated Hermes is an investment manager headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. Founded in 1955 and incorporated on October 18, 1957, the company manages $902.6 billion of customer assets, as of December 2025. The company offers investments spanning equity, fixed-income, alternative/private markets, multi-asset and liquidity management strategies, including mutual funds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), separate accounts, closed-end funds and collective investment funds. Clie...
Sensata Technologies Holding plc is a global industrial technology company that designs, manufactures and sells a broad portfolio of sensing, electrical protection and control solutions. Its products serve automotive, industrial, aerospace, HVAC, telecommunications and heavy vehicle end markets, catering to manufacturing and enterprise clients across the world.
FHI vs ST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $479.0M | $934.8M |
| Net Profit | $96.4M | $87.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 26.4% | 15.1% |
| Net Margin | 20.1% | 9.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.8% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 24.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $479.0M | $934.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $482.8M | $917.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $469.4M | $932.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $424.8M | $943.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $423.5M | $911.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $424.7M | $907.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $408.5M | $982.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $402.6M | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $96.4M | $87.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.0M | $63.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $104.1M | $-162.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.0M | $60.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $101.1M | $69.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.7M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.5M | $-25.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.0M | $71.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 29.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 30.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.0% |
| Q1 26 | 26.4% | 15.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.1% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.6% | -13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.6% | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.1% | 13.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.0% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.4% | -20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | 12.5% |
| Q1 26 | 20.1% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.2% | -17.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.4% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.9% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.4% | -2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 6.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.59 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.38 | $0.45 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.34 | $-1.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.16 | $0.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.25 | $0.47 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.08 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.20 | $0.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $635.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $348.4M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $100.8B | $2.9B |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $6.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $635.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $582.5M | $573.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $506.3M | $791.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $371.0M | $661.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $387.6M | $588.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $504.4M | $593.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $375.0M | $506.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $307.4M | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $348.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $348.4M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $348.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $348.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $348.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $348.1M | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $348.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $348.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $100.8B | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $3.0B |
| Q1 26 | $2.1B | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $8.2B |
| Q1 26 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.29× | 1.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.32× | 1.11× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $122.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $104.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 11.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $508.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $122.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $297.3M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.1M | $159.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $140.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.3M | $119.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $346.6M | $170.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $117.1M | $130.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.7M | $143.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $104.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $294.6M | $151.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.6M | $136.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.0M | $115.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3M | $86.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $342.5M | $138.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $114.1M | $91.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.7M | $98.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 61.0% | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.6% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.2% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 9.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 80.7% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.9% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.5% | 9.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 4.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.78× | 3.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.21× | 2.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.14× | 1.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.09× | 29.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.22× | 2.00× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FHI
| Investment advisory fees, net | $319.4M | 67% |
| Administrative service fees, net-affiliates | $110.3M | 23% |
| Other | $49.3M | 10% |
ST
Segment breakdown not available.
