vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. (FIGR) and FinVolution Group (FINV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FinVolution Group is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($479.7M vs $156.4M, roughly 3.1× Figure Technology Solutions, Inc.). Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 57.3% vs 21.2%, a 36.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. is a financial technology company in Reno, Nevada, United States. Established in 2018, it develops and operates blockchain-based platforms used in lending, capital markets, and asset management.
Volution Group plc is a manufacturer of ventilation equipment for commercial and residential customers. Based in Crawley, West Sussex, the company is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index.
FIGR vs FINV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2025 vs Q1 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $156.4M | $479.7M |
| Net Profit | $89.6M | $101.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 33.7% | 44.6% |
| Net Margin | 57.3% | 21.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.34 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.1B | $745.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $466.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | — |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $745.0M |
| Q3 25 | $466.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.4B |
| Q3 25 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $72.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $70.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 14.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.71× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $72.0M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $70.6M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.7% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
