vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. (FIGR) and GCI Liberty, Inc. (GLIBA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GCI Liberty, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($257.0M vs $156.4M, roughly 1.6× Figure Technology Solutions, Inc.). Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 57.3% vs -150.6%, a 207.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. is a financial technology company in Reno, Nevada, United States. Established in 2018, it develops and operates blockchain-based platforms used in lending, capital markets, and asset management.
GCI Communication Corp (GCI) is a telecommunications corporation operating in Alaska. Through its own facilities and agreements with other providers, GCI provides Internet access, landline, and cellular telephone service. It is a subsidiary of GCI Liberty, Inc.
FIGR vs GLIBA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $156.4M | $257.0M |
| Net Profit | $89.6M | $-387.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 33.7% | -189.9% |
| Net Margin | 57.3% | -150.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.34 | $-13.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $156.4M | $257.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $261.0M |
| Q3 25 | $89.6M | $-387.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $27.0M |
| Q3 25 | 33.7% | -189.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.5% |
| Q3 25 | 57.3% | -150.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.3% |
| Q3 25 | $0.34 | $-13.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.1B | $124.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $466.8M | $985.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $3.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.40× | 0.72× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $124.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $104.0M |
| Q3 25 | $466.8M | $985.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $987.0M |
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.4B |
| Q3 25 | 0.40× | 0.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $49.3M | $76.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $21.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 21.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.55× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $49.3M | $76.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $226.0M |
| Q3 25 | — | $21.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $107.0M |
| Q3 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 41.0% |
| Q3 25 | — | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.6% |
| Q3 25 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.37× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
