vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. (FIGR) and LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. (RAMP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($212.2M vs $156.4M, roughly 1.4× Figure Technology Solutions, Inc.). Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 57.3% vs 18.8%, a 38.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. is a financial technology company in Reno, Nevada, United States. Established in 2018, it develops and operates blockchain-based platforms used in lending, capital markets, and asset management.
LiveRamp Holdings, Inc., is an American SaaS company that offers a data connectivity platform whose services include data onboarding, the transfer of offline data online for marketing purposes.
FIGR vs RAMP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $156.4M | $212.2M |
| Net Profit | $89.6M | $39.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 71.9% |
| Operating Margin | 33.7% | 18.6% |
| Net Margin | 57.3% | 18.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 8.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 255.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.34 | $0.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $212.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $156.4M | $199.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $194.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $188.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $195.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $185.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $176.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $171.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $39.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.6M | $27.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-5.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 71.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 70.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 70.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 69.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 71.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 72.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 70.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 72.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.7% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -8.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.3% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.34 | $0.42 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.1B | $403.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $466.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $962.3M |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $403.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $376.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $371.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $420.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $384.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $348.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $342.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $368.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $466.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $962.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $943.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $947.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $948.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $957.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $932.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $951.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $949.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $49.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.55× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.3M | $57.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-15.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $45.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $55.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-9.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $56.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-16.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $44.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $55.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -8.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.55× | 2.09× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -2.04× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 32.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
