vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. (FIGR) and ZIPRECRUITER, INC. (ZIP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($156.4M vs $111.7M, roughly 1.4× ZIPRECRUITER, INC.). Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 57.3% vs -0.7%, a 58.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. is a financial technology company in Reno, Nevada, United States. Established in 2018, it develops and operates blockchain-based platforms used in lending, capital markets, and asset management.
ZipRecruiter, Inc. is an American employment marketplace for job seekers and employers.
FIGR vs ZIP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $156.4M | $111.7M |
| Net Profit | $89.6M | $-835.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 89.1% |
| Operating Margin | 33.7% | 3.6% |
| Net Margin | 57.3% | -0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 0.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 92.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.34 | $-0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $111.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $156.4M | $115.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $112.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $110.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $117.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $123.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $122.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-835.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.6M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-12.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-10.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-6.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 89.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 89.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 89.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 89.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 89.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 89.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 89.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 89.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.7% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.3% | -8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -5.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.34 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.1B | $188.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $466.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $-77.2M |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $569.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $188.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $211.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $203.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $221.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $218.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $225.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $271.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $282.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $466.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-77.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $-76.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-65.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-11.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $24.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $569.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $573.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $592.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $629.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $664.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $652.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $665.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $662.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $49.3M | $7.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $7.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.55× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $9.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $7.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.3M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-9.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FIGR
Segment breakdown not available.
ZIP
| License | $84.3M | 75% |
| Services | $27.4M | 25% |
