vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FinVolution Group (FINV) and Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NMM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FinVolution Group is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($479.7M vs $327.6M, roughly 1.5× Navios Maritime Partners L.P.). Navios Maritime Partners L.P. runs the higher net margin — 21.4% vs 21.2%, a 0.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Volution Group plc is a manufacturer of ventilation equipment for commercial and residential customers. Based in Crawley, West Sussex, the company is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index.
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. is a multinational, vertically integrated seaborne shipping and logistics company focused on the transport and transshipment of drybulk commodities including iron ore, coal and grain.
FINV vs NMM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $479.7M | $327.6M |
| Net Profit | $101.7M | $69.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 90.5% |
| Operating Margin | 44.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 21.2% | 21.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -31.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | — | $327.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $479.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $342.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $346.9M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $280.7M |
| Q2 25 | — | $69.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $101.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $101.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $112.3M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $118.2M |
| Q2 25 | — | 90.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 88.3% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 87.9% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 92.3% |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.7% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 42.1% |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $745.0M | $377.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | — |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $5.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | $377.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $745.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $272.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $261.4M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $163.4M |
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $1.1B |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $2.0B |
| Q2 25 | — | $5.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $3.7B |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 0.54× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $72.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $70.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.71× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
