vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FinVolution Group (FINV) and PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FinVolution Group is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($479.7M vs $252.6M, roughly 1.9× PicoCELA Inc.). FinVolution Group runs the higher net margin — 21.2% vs -125.2%, a 146.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. FinVolution Group produced more free cash flow last quarter ($70.6M vs $-256.6M).
Volution Group plc is a manufacturer of ventilation equipment for commercial and residential customers. Based in Crawley, West Sussex, the company is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index.
PicoCELA Inc. is a global technology company specializing in low-power, high-reliability wireless connectivity solutions, including Wi-Fi HaLow modules and edge network infrastructure. It caters to industrial IoT, smart city, retail, and smart home segments, with a primary operational footprint across Asia, North America, and European markets.
FINV vs PCLA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $479.7M | $252.6M |
| Net Profit | $101.7M | $-316.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 44.6% | -114.8% |
| Net Margin | 21.2% | -125.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $745.0M | $456.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $354.8M |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 25 | $745.0M | $456.8M |
| Q1 25 | — | $354.8M |
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | $1.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $72.0M | $-245.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $70.6M | $-256.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.7% | -101.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | 4.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.71× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 25 | $72.0M | $-245.6M |
| Q1 25 | $70.6M | $-256.6M |
| Q1 25 | 14.7% | -101.6% |
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 4.3% |
| Q1 25 | 0.71× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FINV
Segment breakdown not available.
PCLA
| Revenue from product | $179.1M | 71% |
| Revenue from SaaS, Maintenance and others | $42.4M | 17% |
| Revenue from product – related party | $31.0M | 12% |
