vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FRANKLIN WIRELESS CORP (FKWL) and SuperCom Ltd (SPCB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SuperCom Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.2M vs $11.9M, roughly 1.2× FRANKLIN WIRELESS CORP). SuperCom Ltd runs the higher net margin — 37.5% vs 4.5%, a 33.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SuperCom Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.5% vs -33.1%). SuperCom Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-3.6M vs $-4.1M).
Viaero Wireless is a regional wireless telecommunications company that provides direct coverage in Nebraska, eastern Colorado, western Kansas, and southeastern Wyoming. Based in Fort Morgan, Colorado, Viaero is often the primary cell tower owner in portions of its coverage area. Through roaming coverage partner relationships, Viaero customers can place and receive calls locally and across the country, internationally, and on cruise ships.
Super.com is a technology company headquartered in San Francisco and co-founded by Hussein Fazal and Henry Shi. The company provides financial services, including reward programs and travel bookings.
FKWL vs SPCB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.9M | $14.2M |
| Net Profit | $533.6K | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | 61.2% |
| Operating Margin | 0.4% | 16.3% |
| Net Margin | 4.5% | 37.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -33.1% | -1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 133.3% | 79.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $1.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $11.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.1M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $533.6K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $640.5K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-342.2K | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-644.8K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $228.7K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $515.2K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.8M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 61.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 52.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -19.0% | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -36.7% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -25.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.9% | 37.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -28.9% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -19.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $1.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.16 | $1.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.10 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $24.3M | $15.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $23.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $35.1M | $37.3M |
| Total Assets | $53.0M | $65.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $24.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.9M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.5M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $35.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.5M | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.1M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $53.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $53.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.3M | $65.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.7M | $49.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.1M | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.1M | $-3.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -34.3% | -25.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 10.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -7.66× | -0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-9.2M | $-14.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-4.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | $-950.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-779.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $-4.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-816.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | -34.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.6% | -25.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -73.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 101.3% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -7.66× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.32× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.99× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
