vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FLEX LTD. (FLEX) and RIO TINTO PLC (RIO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RIO TINTO PLC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($30.8B vs $27.9B, roughly 1.1× FLEX LTD.). RIO TINTO PLC runs the higher net margin — 18.6% vs 0.9%, a 17.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FLEX LTD. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.9% vs 14.6%). RIO TINTO PLC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.3B vs $212.0M).
Flex Ltd. is a Singaporean–American multinational manufacturing company. It is the third largest global electronics manufacturing services (EMS), original design manufacturer (ODM) company by revenue, behind only Pegatron for what concerns original equipment manufacturers. Flex's U.S. corporate headquarters are located in Austin, Texas. The company has manufacturing operations in over 30 countries, totaling about 172,000 employees.
Rio Tinto Group is a British-Australian multinational mining company headquartered in London, England, and Melbourne, Australia. It was founded in 1873 when a group of British investors purchased a mine complex on the Río Tinto, in Huelva, Spain, from the Spanish government. It has grown through a long series of mergers and acquisitions and is today a major producer of commodities such as copper, iron ore, aluminium and lithium.
FLEX vs RIO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $27.9B | $30.8B |
| Net Profit | $250.0M | $5.7B |
| Gross Margin | 2.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.3% | 25.9% |
| Net Margin | 0.9% | 18.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 16.9% | 14.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.6% | 0.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.67 | $3.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $27.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.1B | $30.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6B | $26.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3B | — |
| Q1 26 | $250.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $239.0M | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $199.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $192.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $222.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $263.0M | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $214.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $139.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 27.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.67 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.64 | $3.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.52 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.67 | $3.51 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.54 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.34 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.4B | $9.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.8B | $21.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.1B | $67.0B |
| Total Assets | $22.1B | $128.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.73× | 0.33× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $9.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $8.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $21.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $12.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $67.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $58.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $22.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.8B | $128.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.3B | $102.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.7B | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.87× | 0.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | 0.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.64× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $413.0M | $9.9B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $212.0M | $2.3B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.8% | 7.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 24.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.65× | 1.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.1B | $11.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $413.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $420.0M | $9.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $453.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $399.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $433.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $413.0M | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $319.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $340.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $212.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $272.0M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $303.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $266.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $321.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $301.0M | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $216.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $229.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 24.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.65× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.76× | 1.73× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.28× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.08× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.95× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.57× | 1.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.45× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
