vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FULL HOUSE RESORTS INC (FLL) and LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP (LSCC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($145.8M vs $75.4M, roughly 1.9× FULL HOUSE RESORTS INC). LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP runs the higher net margin — -5.2% vs -16.4%, a 11.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.3% vs 3.4%). LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($44.0M vs $10.7M). Over the past eight quarters, LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP's revenue compounded faster (8.4% CAGR vs 3.9%).
Full House Resorts, Inc. is an American casino developer and operator based in Summerlin South, Nevada. The company currently operates five casinos. It is known for the involvement of Gulfstream Aerospace founder Allen Paulson, who was CEO from 1994 to 2000, and former Chrysler chairman Lee Iacocca, who was a major investor in the company from 1995 to 2013. Dan Lee has been CEO since late 2014.
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation is an American semiconductor company specializing in the design and manufacturing of low power field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs). Headquartered in the Silicon Forest area of Hillsboro, Oregon, the company also has operations in San Jose, Calif., Shanghai, Manila, Penang, and Singapore. Lattice Semiconductor has more than 1000 employees and an annual revenue of more than $660 million as of 2022. The company was founded in 1983 and went public in 1989. It ...
FLL vs LSCC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $75.4M | $145.8M |
| Net Profit | $-12.4M | $-7.6M |
| Gross Margin | 93.1% | 68.5% |
| Operating Margin | -1.3% | 30.7% |
| Net Margin | -16.4% | -5.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.4% | 9.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -0.6% | 14.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $145.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $75.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.0M | $133.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.9M | $124.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $75.1M | $120.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $73.0M | $117.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $75.7M | $127.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.5M | $124.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-7.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.7M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.4M | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.8M | $5.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-12.3M | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.5M | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.6M | $22.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 68.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 93.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 93.2% | 67.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 93.5% | 68.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 93.4% | 68.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 92.1% | 61.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 92.2% | 69.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 92.4% | 68.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | -1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.9% | -10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 18.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | -5.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -16.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.8% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.0% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.0% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -16.9% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.2% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.7% | 18.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.35 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.21 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.29 | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.27 | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.34 | $0.12 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.24 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.25 | $0.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $40.7M | $133.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $473.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.5M | $714.1M |
| Total Assets | $649.8M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 186.62× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $133.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $40.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.9M | $117.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.1M | $107.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.7M | $127.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.2M | $136.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.9M | $124.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.1M | $109.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $473.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $473.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $467.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $471.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $468.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $467.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $466.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $714.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.2M | $706.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.2M | $687.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.0M | $707.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.5M | $710.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.8M | $703.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.5M | $698.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $883.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $649.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $644.4M | $844.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $651.5M | $808.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $657.2M | $823.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $673.3M | $843.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $668.7M | $853.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $673.9M | $827.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 186.62× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.30× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.04× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.22× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.56× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.02× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.85× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $12.0M | $57.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $10.7M | $44.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.1% | 30.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-2.7M | $153.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $57.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-472.0K | $47.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $38.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.5M | $31.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.8M | $45.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.7M | $44.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.1M | $21.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $44.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.5M | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5M | $31.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.3M | $23.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | $39.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-17.4M | $39.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.2M | $14.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.1% | 25.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | 25.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.4% | 19.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.4% | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -23.0% | 31.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.6% | 11.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.5% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.1% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.4% | 5.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.23× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.12× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.97× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FLL
| Midwest And South | $58.2M | 77% |
| Food And Beverage | $9.7M | 13% |
| Other Operations | $3.6M | 5% |
| Other | $2.3M | 3% |
| Contracted Sports Wagering | $1.7M | 2% |
LSCC
Segment breakdown not available.
