vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Flex LNG Ltd. (FLNG) and LendingClub Corp (LC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LendingClub Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($252.3M vs $173.2M, roughly 1.5× Flex LNG Ltd.). Flex LNG Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 22.2% vs 20.5%, a 1.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LendingClub Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs -4.5%).
Golar LNG owns and operates marine LNG infrastructure. The company had developed Floating LNG liquefaction terminal (FLNG) and Floating Storage and Regasification Unit (FSRU) projects based on the conversion of existing LNG carriers. Front End Engineering and Design (FEED) studies have now been completed for a larger newbuild FLNG solution. Golar is also collaborating with another industry leader to investigate solutions for the floating production of blue and green ammonia as well as carbon ...
LendingClub Corporation is an American financial services company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It was the first peer-to-peer lender to register its offerings as securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and to offer loan trading on a secondary market. At its height, LendingClub was the world's largest peer-to-peer lending platform. The company reported that $15.98 billion in loans had been originated through its platform up to December 31, 2015.
FLNG vs LC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $173.2M | $252.3M |
| Net Profit | $38.4M | $51.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 48.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 22.2% | 20.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.5% | 15.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -38.7% | 341.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.71 | $0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $252.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $173.2M | $266.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $266.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $248.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $217.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $181.4M | $217.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $201.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $187.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $51.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $38.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $44.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $38.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $62.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $14.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 48.9% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.9% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.44 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.71 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.16 | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $447.6M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.9B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $719.3M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $11.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.59× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $447.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $437.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $0 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $719.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $806.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $11.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $11.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.59× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.26× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.92× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $-2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-770.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-713.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-339.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.4M | $-2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-669.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-932.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-791.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-803.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-352.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-682.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-945.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -1076.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -297.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -323.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -161.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1237.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -338.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -504.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 52.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.92× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -17.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -18.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -29.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -46.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -62.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
