vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FLUOR CORP (FLR) and Marriott International (MAR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Marriott International is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.7B vs $3.7B, roughly 1.8× FLUOR CORP). Marriott International runs the higher net margin — 6.7% vs 4.5%, a 2.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Marriott International posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.1% vs -8.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Marriott International's revenue compounded faster (5.8% CAGR vs -6.9%).
Fluor Corporation is an American engineering and construction firm, headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a holding company that provides services through its subsidiaries in three main areas: oil and gas, industrial and infrastructure, government and power. It is the largest publicly traded engineering and construction company in the Fortune 500 rankings and is listed as 265th overall.
Marriott International, Inc. is an American multinational company that operates, franchises, and licenses lodging brands that include hotel, residential, and timeshare properties. Marriott International owns over 37 hotel and timeshare brands with 9,000 locations and 1,597,380 rooms across its network. Marriott International is headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland. The company is the successor to the hospitality division of the Marriott Corporation, founded by J.
FLR vs MAR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.7B | $6.7B |
| Net Profit | $165.0M | $445.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 11.6% |
| Net Margin | 4.5% | 6.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.0% | 4.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 166.4% | -2.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.08 | $1.67 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $6.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $6.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | $165.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.6B | $445.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-697.0M | $728.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $763.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-241.0M | $665.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $455.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.0M | $584.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $169.0M | $772.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -13.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -14.7% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.7% | 18.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | 15.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 15.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 18.6% |
| Q1 26 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -37.7% | 6.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.7% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 61.8% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.1% | 10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.7% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 12.0% |
| Q1 26 | $1.08 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-9.40 | $1.67 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.30 | $2.67 | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.81 | $2.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.42 | $2.39 | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.68 | $1.64 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.31 | $2.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.97 | $2.69 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $358.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $15.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $-3.8B |
| Total Assets | — | $27.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $358.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $678.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $671.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $523.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $396.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $394.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $349.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $15.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $14.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $14.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $-3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | $-3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9B | $-3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6B | $-3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9B | $-3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $-2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $-2.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.2B | $27.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.5B | $27.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.8B | $27.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.4B | $26.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1B | $26.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.1B | $26.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8B | $25.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $829.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.86× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-366.0M | $829.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $286.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-21.0M | $643.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-286.0M | $647.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $327.0M | $318.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $330.0M | $880.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $282.0M | $772.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-378.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $273.0M | $951.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-35.0M | $488.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-297.0M | $512.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $296.0M | $-24.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $279.0M | $706.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $234.0M | $647.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -9.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.1% | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.9% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.9% | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | 11.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 10.0% |
| Q1 26 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.7% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.86× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.01× | 0.84× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.18× | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.11× | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.67× | 1.00× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FLR
| Urban Solutions | $2.4B | 67% |
| Energy Solutions | $703.0M | 19% |
| Mission Solutions | $523.0M | 14% |
MAR
Segment breakdown not available.
