vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FLOWSERVE CORP (FLS) and HEICO CORP (HEI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FLOWSERVE CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.0× HEICO CORP). HEICO CORP runs the higher net margin — 15.6% vs -2.4%, a 17.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HEICO CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.3% vs 3.5%). HEICO CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($268.5M vs $-25.6M). Over the past eight quarters, HEICO CORP's revenue compounded faster (16.2% CAGR vs 6.0%).
The Flowserve Corporation is an American multinational corporation and one of the largest suppliers of industrial and environmental machinery such as pumps, valves, end face mechanical seals, automation, and services to the power, oil, gas, chemical and other industries. Headquartered in Irving, Texas, which is in the Dallas–Fort Worth Metroplex, Flowserve employs close to 16,000 employees in more than 50 countries. Flowserve sells products and offers aftermarket services to engineering and c...
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. is an American multinational conglomerate holding company headquartered in Omaha, Nebraska. Originally a textile manufacturer, the company transitioned into a conglomerate starting in 1965 under the management of chairman and CEO Warren Buffett and vice chairman Charlie Munger. Greg Abel succeeded Buffett as CEO at the beginning of 2026. Buffett personally owns 38.4% of the Class A voting shares of Berkshire Hathaway, representing a 15.1% overall economic interest in t...
FLS vs HEI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $-29.0M | $188.3M |
| Gross Margin | 34.8% | 40.2% |
| Operating Margin | 3.5% | 23.1% |
| Net Margin | -2.4% | 15.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.5% | 19.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -137.4% | 34.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.21 | $1.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $992.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $955.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $896.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-29.0M | $188.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $219.6M | $177.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.8M | $156.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.9M | $168.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.5M | $139.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.4M | $136.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.6M | $123.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $74.2M | $114.7M |
| Q4 25 | 34.8% | 40.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.4% | 39.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.2% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.3% | 39.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | 38.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.5% | 39.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.6% | 38.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.2% | 38.7% |
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 23.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.3% | 22.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.5% | 22.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.6% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.4% | 20.1% |
| Q4 25 | -2.4% | 15.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.7% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | 16.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.8% | 12.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.21 | $1.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.67 | $1.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.62 | $1.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $1.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.59 | $1.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.44 | $0.97 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.55 | $0.88 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.56 | $0.82 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $760.2M | $217.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.6B | $2.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $4.3B |
| Total Assets | $5.7B | $8.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | 0.50× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $760.2M | $217.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $261.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $242.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $165.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $675.4M | $162.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $202.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $204.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $196.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $3.3B |
| Q4 25 | $5.7B | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $8.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5B | $7.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5B | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2B | $7.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.1B | $7.3B |
| Q4 25 | 0.72× | 0.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.76× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-174.0K | $295.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-25.6M | $268.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.1% | 22.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | 2.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.57× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $435.0M | $861.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-174.0K | $295.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $401.8M | $231.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $154.1M | $204.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-49.9M | $203.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.3M | $205.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $178.5M | $214.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-12.8M | $141.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $62.3M | $111.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-25.6M | $268.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $384.7M | $218.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $137.5M | $188.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-61.7M | $185.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $168.5M | $189.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $154.6M | $198.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-27.5M | $128.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $48.6M | $98.3M |
| Q4 25 | -2.1% | 22.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.8% | 19.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.4% | 18.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.3% | 18.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | 20.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.5% | 11.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.57× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.83× | 1.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.89× | 1.31× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.68× | 1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.55× | 1.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.06× | 1.57× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.18× | 1.15× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.84× | 0.97× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FLS
| Aftermarket Equipment | $563.4M | 46% |
| FCD | $390.3M | 32% |
| Original Equipment | $268.5M | 22% |
HEI
| Aftermarket Replacement Parts | $510.0M | 42% |
| Electronic Componentsfor Defense Spaceand Aerospace | $311.8M | 26% |
| Defenseand Space | $170.6M | 14% |
| Specialty Products | $118.9M | 10% |
| Other Electronic Components | $73.0M | 6% |
| Other Industries | $15.9M | 1% |
