vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FLOWSERVE CORP (FLS) and MILLERKNOLL, INC. (MLKN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FLOWSERVE CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $955.2M, roughly 1.3× MILLERKNOLL, INC.). MILLERKNOLL, INC. runs the higher net margin — 2.5% vs -2.4%, a 4.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FLOWSERVE CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.5% vs -1.6%). MILLERKNOLL, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($34.0M vs $-25.6M).
The Flowserve Corporation is an American multinational corporation and one of the largest suppliers of industrial and environmental machinery such as pumps, valves, end face mechanical seals, automation, and services to the power, oil, gas, chemical and other industries. Headquartered in Irving, Texas, which is in the Dallas–Fort Worth Metroplex, Flowserve employs close to 16,000 employees in more than 50 countries. Flowserve sells products and offers aftermarket services to engineering and c...
MillerKnoll, Incorporated, doing business as Herman Miller, is an American company that produces office furniture, equipment, and home furnishings. Its best known designs include the Aeron chair, Noguchi table, Marshmallow sofa, Mirra chair, and Eames Lounge Chair. Herman Miller is also credited with the 1968 invention of the office cubicle under then–director of research Robert Propst.
FLS vs MLKN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $955.2M |
| Net Profit | $-29.0M | $24.2M |
| Gross Margin | 34.8% | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | 3.5% | 5.1% |
| Net Margin | -2.4% | 2.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.5% | -1.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -137.4% | -29.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.21 | $0.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $955.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $955.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $-29.0M | $24.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $219.6M | $20.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $74.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 34.8% | 39.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.4% | 38.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -2.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.21 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.67 | $0.29 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.62 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.59 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.56 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $760.2M | $180.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.6B | $1.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $5.7B | $3.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | 1.02× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $760.2M | $180.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $167.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $675.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.7B | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.72× | 1.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-174.0K | $64.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-25.6M | $34.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.1% | 3.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.67× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $435.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-174.0K | $64.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $401.8M | $9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $154.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-49.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $178.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-12.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $62.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-25.6M | $34.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $384.7M | $-21.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $137.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-61.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $168.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $154.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-27.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $48.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | -2.1% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.8% | -2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.67× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.83× | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.68× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.55× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.18× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.84× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FLS
| Aftermarket Equipment | $563.4M | 46% |
| FCD | $390.3M | 32% |
| Original Equipment | $268.5M | 22% |
MLKN
| Workplace | $309.9M | 32% |
| Global Retail Segment | $275.8M | 29% |
| International Contract Segment | $170.9M | 18% |
| Performance Seating | $101.1M | 11% |
| Lifestyle | $52.9M | 6% |
| Other Products | $44.6M | 5% |
