vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FLOWSERVE CORP (FLS) and NEUROCRINE BIOSCIENCES INC (NBIX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FLOWSERVE CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $805.5M, roughly 1.5× NEUROCRINE BIOSCIENCES INC). NEUROCRINE BIOSCIENCES INC runs the higher net margin — 19.1% vs -2.4%, a 21.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NEUROCRINE BIOSCIENCES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.3% vs 3.5%). NEUROCRINE BIOSCIENCES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($386.0M vs $-25.6M). Over the past eight quarters, NEUROCRINE BIOSCIENCES INC's revenue compounded faster (25.0% CAGR vs 6.0%).
The Flowserve Corporation is an American multinational corporation and one of the largest suppliers of industrial and environmental machinery such as pumps, valves, end face mechanical seals, automation, and services to the power, oil, gas, chemical and other industries. Headquartered in Irving, Texas, which is in the Dallas–Fort Worth Metroplex, Flowserve employs close to 16,000 employees in more than 50 countries. Flowserve sells products and offers aftermarket services to engineering and c...
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. is an American biopharmaceutical company founded in 1992. It is headquartered in San Diego, California, and led by CEO Kyle Gano as of October 11, 2024. Neurocrine develops treatments for neurological and endocrine-related diseases and disorders. In 2017, the company's drug valbenazine (Ingrezza) was approved in the US to treat adults with tardive dyskinesia (TD).
FLS vs NBIX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $805.5M |
| Net Profit | $-29.0M | $153.7M |
| Gross Margin | 34.8% | 97.8% |
| Operating Margin | 3.5% | 26.2% |
| Net Margin | -2.4% | 19.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.5% | 28.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -137.4% | 49.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.21 | $1.49 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $805.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $794.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $687.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $572.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $627.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $622.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $590.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $515.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-29.0M | $153.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $219.6M | $209.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.8M | $107.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.9M | $7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.5M | $103.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.4M | $129.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.6M | $65.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $74.2M | $43.4M |
| Q4 25 | 34.8% | 97.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.4% | 98.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.2% | 98.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.3% | 98.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | 98.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.5% | 98.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.6% | 98.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.2% | 98.5% |
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | 26.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 30.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.3% | 21.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.5% | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.6% | 22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 29.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 24.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.4% | 19.3% |
| Q4 25 | -2.4% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.7% | 26.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.8% | 8.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.21 | $1.49 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.67 | $2.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.62 | $1.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.59 | $1.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.44 | $1.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.55 | $0.63 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.56 | $0.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $760.2M | $713.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.6B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $3.3B |
| Total Assets | $5.7B | $4.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $760.2M | $713.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $340.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $264.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $194.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $675.4M | $233.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $349.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $139.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $396.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | $5.7B | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.1B | $3.5B |
| Q4 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-174.0K | $388.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-25.6M | $386.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.1% | 47.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $435.0M | $743.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-174.0K | $388.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $401.8M | $227.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $154.1M | $102.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-49.9M | $64.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.3M | $242.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $178.5M | $158.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-12.8M | $64.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $62.3M | $130.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-25.6M | $386.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $384.7M | $214.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $137.5M | $89.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-61.7M | $54.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $168.5M | $235.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $154.6M | $149.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-27.5M | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $48.6M | $119.1M |
| Q4 25 | -2.1% | 47.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.8% | 27.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.4% | 9.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.3% | 37.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | 24.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.5% | 23.1% |
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | 2.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.83× | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.89× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.68× | 8.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.55× | 2.35× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.06× | 1.22× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.18× | 0.99× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.84× | 3.00× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FLS
| Aftermarket Equipment | $563.4M | 46% |
| FCD | $390.3M | 32% |
| Original Equipment | $268.5M | 22% |
NBIX
| INGREZZA Net Product Sales | $653.8M | 81% |
| CRENESSITY Net Product Sales | $135.4M | 17% |
| Other Income | $12.6M | 2% |
| Collaboration Revenue | $7.2M | 1% |
