vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BingEx Ltd (FLX) and HighPeak Energy, Inc. (HPK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HighPeak Energy, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($216.6M vs $143.2M, roughly 1.5× BingEx Ltd). BingEx Ltd runs the higher net margin — 2.2% vs -11.6%, a 13.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Duke Energy Corporation is an American electric power and natural gas holding company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina. The company serves over 7 million customers in the eastern United States. In 2024 it ranked as the 141st largest company in the United States – its highest-ever placement on the Fortune 500 list.
FLX vs HPK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.2M | $216.6M |
| Net Profit | $3.2M | $-25.2M |
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -7.6% |
| Net Margin | 2.2% | -11.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -23.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -380.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $143.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $216.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.2M | $188.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.0M | $200.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0M | $257.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $282.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.6M | $271.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $275.3M |
| Q1 26 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-25.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1M | $-18.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $26.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.6M | $36.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | $49.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.7M |
| Q1 26 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 21.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 27.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 31.7% |
| Q1 26 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -11.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | -9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.6% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 18.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $561.1M | $162.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $3.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.75× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $561.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $162.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $628.6M | $164.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $499.4M | $21.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $592.4M | $51.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $86.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $517.4M | $135.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $157.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $926.8M | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $93.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $93.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $120.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $141.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $157.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $139.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $177.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $202.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.39× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.53× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.55× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.81× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FLX
Segment breakdown not available.
HPK
| Crude Oil Sales | $152.1M | 70% |
| Natural Gas And NGL Sales | $60.8M | 28% |
