vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BingEx Ltd (FLX) and H2O AMERICA (HTO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
H2O AMERICA is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($199.4M vs $143.2M, roughly 1.4× BingEx Ltd). H2O AMERICA runs the higher net margin — 8.1% vs 2.2%, a 5.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
H2O Wireless is a United States-based prepaid cell phone service, that utilizes the AT&T network. It is a brand of the mobile virtual network operator (MVNO) Locus Telecommunications, a subsidiary of Telrite Holdings, Inc., since 2019. Locus was formerly a subsidiary of KDDI America corporation, starting in 2010. H2O Wireless is primarily advertised as a non-restrictive phone service for customers to bring or buy unlocked smartphones, although AT&T contract/locked phones may be accepted as well.
FLX vs HTO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.2M | $199.4M |
| Net Profit | $3.2M | $16.2M |
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 16.6% |
| Net Margin | 2.2% | 8.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -29.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.45 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $143.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $199.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.2M | $243.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.0M | $197.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0M | $164.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $196.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.6M | $216.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $173.1M |
| Q1 26 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $16.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1M | $45.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.6M | $16.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $22.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | $38.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $20.7M |
| Q1 26 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.4% |
| Q1 26 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.6% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.45 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.71 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.64 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $561.1M | $20.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.23× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $561.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $20.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $628.6M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $499.4M | $19.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $592.4M | $23.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $517.4M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $22.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $926.8M | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $63.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.92× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $63.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $77.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $60.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $43.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $41.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $53.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $49.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.92× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.71× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.61× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.38× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FLX
Segment breakdown not available.
HTO
| Water Utility Services | $191.0M | 96% |
| Other | $8.4M | 4% |
