vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BingEx Ltd (FLX) and LXP Industrial Trust (LXP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BingEx Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($143.2M vs $86.7M, roughly 1.7× LXP Industrial Trust). LXP Industrial Trust runs the higher net margin — 33.2% vs 2.2%, a 30.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
LXP Industrial Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality industrial real estate assets, primarily distribution centers, logistics facilities, and light industrial properties across key markets in the United States. Its tenant base covers e-commerce, third-party logistics, and advanced manufacturing sectors, delivering stable long-term returns for its investors.
FLX vs LXP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.2M | $86.7M |
| Net Profit | $3.2M | $28.8M |
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | 81.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 34.6% |
| Net Margin | 2.2% | 33.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $143.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $86.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.2M | $86.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.0M | $87.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0M | $88.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $100.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.6M | $85.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $85.8M |
| Q1 26 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1M | $36.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.6M | $19.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.4M |
| Q1 26 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 81.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | 82.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | 81.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 80.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 85.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | 82.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 82.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 34.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 50.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 33.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.9% |
| Q1 26 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 33.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | 41.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 33.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.6% | 21.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $561.1M | $170.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $3.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.66× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $561.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $170.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $628.6M | $229.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $499.4M | $71.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $592.4M | $70.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $101.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $517.4M | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $48.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $926.8M | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $188.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 6.56× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $188.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $63.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $44.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $39.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $211.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $64.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $38.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.09× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
