vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BingEx Ltd (FLX) and Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BingEx Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($143.2M vs $121.0M, roughly 1.2× Ramaco Resources, Inc.). BingEx Ltd runs the higher net margin — 2.2% vs -11.0%, a 13.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Ramaco Resources, Inc. is a U.S.-based mining company focused on high-grade metallurgical coal production. It operates mining assets across the Appalachian region, supplying products to global steel manufacturing and industrial clients, with core operations centered on sustainable low-cost metallurgical coal extraction and distribution.
FLX vs METC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.2M | $121.0M |
| Net Profit | $3.2M | $-13.3M |
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | 15.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | -12.0% |
| Net Margin | 2.2% | -11.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -27.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -5468.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $143.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.2M | $121.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.0M | $153.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0M | $134.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $170.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.6M | $167.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $155.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $172.7M |
| Q1 26 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1M | $-13.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $-14.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.6M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | $-239.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.0M |
| Q1 26 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | 19.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 19.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | -12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | -9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | -11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | -9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.6% | -7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | -0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $561.1M | $193.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $116.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $526.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $849.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.22× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $561.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $628.6M | $193.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $499.4M | $28.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $592.4M | $43.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $33.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $517.4M | $22.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $27.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $30.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $116.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $88.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $526.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $347.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $355.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $362.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $361.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $366.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $372.3M |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $849.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $674.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $685.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $674.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $926.8M | $645.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $659.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $674.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-1.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-17.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -14.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 13.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-24.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $26.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $37.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $34.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $25.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-17.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-19.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $20.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -13.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.21× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.40× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FLX
Segment breakdown not available.
METC
| Export Coal Revenues | $73.0M | 60% |
| Domestic Coal Revenues | $48.0M | 40% |
