vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BingEx Ltd (FLX) and TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC (TR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($196.3M vs $143.2M, roughly 1.4× BingEx Ltd). TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 14.7% vs 2.2%, a 12.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Tootsie Roll Industries is an American manufacturer of confectionery based in Chicago, Illinois. Its best-known products include the namesake Tootsie Rolls and Tootsie Pops. Tootsie Roll Industries currently markets its brands internationally in Canada, Mexico, and over 75 other countries.
FLX vs TR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.2M | $196.3M |
| Net Profit | $3.2M | $28.8M |
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | 35.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 17.0% |
| Net Margin | 2.2% | 14.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $143.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $196.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.2M | $232.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.0M | $155.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0M | $148.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $193.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.6M | $225.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $150.7M |
| Q1 26 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1M | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.6M | $18.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $22.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | $32.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $15.6M |
| Q1 26 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 35.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | 36.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 35.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 39.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 20.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.2% |
| Q1 26 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.6% | 12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.4% |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $561.1M | $176.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $941.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $561.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $176.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $628.6M | $119.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $499.4M | $170.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $592.4M | $176.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $194.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $517.4M | $163.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $131.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $941.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $918.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $893.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $879.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $870.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $870.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $841.4M |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $926.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $73.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $61.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 31.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 6.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $96.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $73.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $62.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-8.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $68.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-12.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $61.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $50.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $750.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $64.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $55.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-16.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 31.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -11.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.74× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.49× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.81× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FLX
Segment breakdown not available.
TR
| Products | $194.3M | 99% |
| Rental And Royalty | $1.9M | 1% |
