vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Firefly Aerospace Inc. (FLY) and Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. (PLYM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($51.2M vs $30.8M, roughly 1.7× Firefly Aerospace Inc.). Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -106.3% vs -433.5%, a 327.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Firefly Aerospace Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (37.6% vs -1.4%).
Firefly Aerospace, Inc. (Firefly) is an American aerospace firm based in Cedar Park, Texas. Firefly develops small- and medium-lift launch vehicles for commercial launches to orbit. Firefly's stated purpose is to increase access to space, similar to other private spaceflight companies.
Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is a real estate investment trust focused on owning, operating, and acquiring high-quality industrial properties including distribution centers, warehouses, and light industrial facilities across key U.S. logistics hubs. It serves tenants in e-commerce, retail, manufacturing, and third-party logistics sectors, supporting diverse business supply chain needs.
FLY vs PLYM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $30.8M | $51.2M |
| Net Profit | $-133.4M | $-54.4M |
| Gross Margin | 27.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -202.1% | -102.5% |
| Net Margin | -433.5% | -106.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 37.6% | -1.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -227.1% | -248.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.50 | $-1.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $30.8M | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.5M | $47.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $47.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.4M | $51.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.1M | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $50.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $50.8M |
| Q3 25 | $-133.4M | $-54.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-63.8M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $147.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-40.8M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-53.5M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $9.3M |
| Q3 25 | 27.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | -202.1% | -102.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -349.5% | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -152.9% | -29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -232.1% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | -433.5% | -106.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -410.2% | -12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 309.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -182.3% | -30.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -253.7% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 18.3% |
| Q3 25 | $-1.50 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.78 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.57 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.60 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $995.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $948.8M | $470.1M |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $995.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $205.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $136.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $646.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $873.4M |
| Q3 25 | $948.8M | $470.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-918.0M | $539.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $571.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $579.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-665.5M | $436.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-620.0M | $475.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $484.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $483.0M |
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $466.8M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $1.4B |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 1.81× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-53.0M | $20.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-62.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -201.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 29.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-53.0M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $96.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $19.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $16.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $18.6M |
| Q3 25 | $-62.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | -201.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 29.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.67× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 2.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FLY
| Spacecraft Solutions Revenue | $21.4M | 69% |
| Launch Revenue | $9.4M | 31% |
PLYM
Segment breakdown not available.
