vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FIRST MID BANCSHARES, INC. (FMBH) and Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. (PLYM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FIRST MID BANCSHARES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($88.2M vs $51.2M, roughly 1.7× Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc.). FIRST MID BANCSHARES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 26.8% vs -106.3%, a 133.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FIRST MID BANCSHARES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.4% vs -1.4%). Over the past eight quarters, FIRST MID BANCSHARES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (5.0% CAGR vs 0.4%).
First Mid Bancshares Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered regional financial services holding company. It provides full-range retail and commercial banking products, wealth management, insurance solutions, and agricultural financing, mainly serving individual consumers, small and medium-sized enterprises, and agricultural clients across multiple Midwestern states including Illinois, Missouri, and Indiana.
Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is a real estate investment trust focused on owning, operating, and acquiring high-quality industrial properties including distribution centers, warehouses, and light industrial facilities across key U.S. logistics hubs. It serves tenants in e-commerce, retail, manufacturing, and third-party logistics sectors, supporting diverse business supply chain needs.
FMBH vs PLYM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $88.2M | $51.2M |
| Net Profit | $23.7M | $-54.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 34.0% | -102.5% |
| Net Margin | 26.8% | -106.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.4% | -1.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 23.5% | -248.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.98 | $-1.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $88.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.3M | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.5M | $47.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.3M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.3M | $47.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.6M | $51.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.2M | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $79.9M | $50.2M |
| Q4 25 | $23.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.5M | $-54.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.4M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.2M | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.2M | $147.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.5M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.7M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.5M | $6.2M |
| Q4 25 | 34.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.2% | -102.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.4% | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.5% | -29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.7% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.2% | -106.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.8% | -12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.3% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.5% | 309.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.2% | -30.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.9% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.6% | 12.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.98 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.94 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.98 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.93 | $0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.81 | $3.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.81 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.82 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.86 | $0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $354.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $958.7M | $470.1M |
| Total Assets | $8.0B | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.37× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $354.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $646.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $958.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $932.2M | $470.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $894.1M | $539.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $870.9M | $571.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $846.4M | $579.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $858.5M | $436.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $813.6M | $475.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $798.0M | $484.6M |
| Q4 25 | $8.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.8B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.7B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $130.9M | $20.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $124.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 140.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.53× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $207.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $130.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.0M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.7M | $23.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.9M | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $124.4M | $96.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.1M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.0M | $19.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.0M | $16.6M |
| Q4 25 | $124.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $119.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 140.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 54.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 140.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.53× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.16× | 2.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.49× | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.70× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.21× | 15.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.42× | 2.67× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
