vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fabrinet (FN) and Snap-on (SNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Snap-on is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.1× Fabrinet). Snap-on runs the higher net margin — 21.3% vs 9.9%, a 11.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fabrinet posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.9% vs 2.7%). Snap-on produced more free cash flow last quarter ($254.6M vs $-5.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Fabrinet's revenue compounded faster (24.4% CAGR vs 2.0%).
FabrinetFNEarnings & Financial Report
Below is a list of companies having stocks that are included in the S&P MidCap 400 stock market index. The index, maintained by S&P Dow Jones Indices, comprises the common stocks of 400 mid-cap, mostly American, companies. Although called the S&P 400, the index sometimes contains more than 400 stocks when it includes two or more share classes of stock from one of its component companies.
Snap-on Incorporated is an American designer, manufacturer, and marketer of high-end tools and equipment for professional use in the transportation industry, including the automotive, heavy duty, equipment, marine, aviation, and railroad industries. Headquartered in Kenosha, Wisconsin, since 1930, Snap-on also distributes lower-end tools under the brand name Blue-Point. Their primary competitors include Matco, Mac Tools, and Cornwell Tools.
FN vs SNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $112.6M | $260.7M |
| Gross Margin | 12.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.1% | 27.8% |
| Net Margin | 9.9% | 21.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 35.9% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.0% | 1.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.11 | $4.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $978.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $909.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $871.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $833.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $804.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $753.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $731.5M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $112.6M | $260.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.9M | $265.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.2M | $250.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.3M | $240.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $86.6M | $258.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.4M | $251.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $81.1M | $271.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $80.9M | $263.5M |
| Q4 25 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.1% | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.6% | 29.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.8% | 28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.7% | 28.9% |
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 21.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.8% | 23.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.1% | 22.4% |
| Q4 25 | $3.11 | $4.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.66 | $5.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.41 | $4.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.25 | $4.51 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.38 | $4.83 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.13 | $4.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.22 | $5.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.21 | $4.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $960.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | — |
| Total Assets | $3.3B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $960.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $968.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $934.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $950.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $934.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $908.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $858.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $794.0M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $5.1B |
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $8.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $8.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $7.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $46.3M | $268.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-5.3M | $254.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.5% | 20.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.6% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.41× | 1.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $102.3M | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $46.3M | $268.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.6M | $277.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.1M | $237.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.2M | $298.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.9M | $293.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.2M | $274.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.1M | $301.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $100.9M | $348.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-5.3M | $254.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.3M | $258.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $217.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.7M | $275.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.0M | $275.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.9M | $253.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.4M | $277.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $87.3M | $326.9M |
| Q4 25 | -0.5% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.2% | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.3% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.8% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | 4.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.41× | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.07× | 1.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.63× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.91× | 1.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.34× | 1.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.07× | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.02× | 1.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.25× | 1.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FN
| Optical Communications | $832.6M | 73% |
| Non Optical Communications | $300.3M | 27% |
SNA
Segment breakdown not available.
