vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fabrinet (FN) and UPBOUND GROUP, INC. (UPBD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UPBOUND GROUP, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.1× Fabrinet). Fabrinet runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs 1.7%, a 8.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fabrinet posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.9% vs 10.9%). UPBOUND GROUP, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($24.0M vs $-5.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Fabrinet's revenue compounded faster (24.4% CAGR vs 4.5%).
FabrinetFNEarnings & Financial Report
Below is a list of companies having stocks that are included in the S&P MidCap 400 stock market index. The index, maintained by S&P Dow Jones Indices, comprises the common stocks of 400 mid-cap, mostly American, companies. Although called the S&P 400, the index sometimes contains more than 400 stocks when it includes two or more share classes of stock from one of its component companies.
Upbound Group, Inc. is a leading US provider of flexible lease-to-own solutions for consumer goods. It offers furniture, consumer electronics, home appliances, and accessories, catering to customers seeking accessible payment alternatives to traditional retail financing.
FN vs UPBD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $112.6M | $19.7M |
| Gross Margin | 12.2% | 49.0% |
| Operating Margin | 10.1% | 4.8% |
| Net Margin | 9.9% | 1.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 35.9% | 10.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.0% | -36.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.11 | $0.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $978.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $909.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $871.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $833.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $804.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $753.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $731.5M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $112.6M | $19.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.9M | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.2M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.3M | $24.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $86.6M | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.4M | $30.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $81.1M | $33.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $80.9M | $27.7M |
| Q4 25 | 12.2% | 49.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.9% | 48.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.2% | 49.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.7% | 46.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.1% | 47.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | 47.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.3% | 49.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | 48.3% |
| Q4 25 | 10.1% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.6% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.8% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.7% | 5.6% |
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.1% | 2.5% |
| Q4 25 | $3.11 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.66 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.41 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.25 | $0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.38 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.13 | $0.55 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.22 | $0.61 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.21 | $0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $960.8M | $120.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $695.7M |
| Total Assets | $3.3B | $3.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $960.8M | $120.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $968.8M | $107.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $934.2M | $106.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $950.7M | $107.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $934.6M | $60.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $908.9M | $85.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $858.6M | $82.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $794.0M | $84.8M |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $695.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $687.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $685.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $679.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $629.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $611.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $596.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $578.3M |
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $2.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $46.3M | $41.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-5.3M | $24.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.5% | 2.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.6% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.41× | 2.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $102.3M | $238.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $46.3M | $41.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.6M | $118.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.1M | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.2M | $137.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.9M | $-61.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.2M | $106.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.1M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $100.9M | $45.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-5.3M | $24.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.3M | $97.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.7M | $127.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.0M | $-74.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.9M | $88.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.4M | $613.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $87.3M | $33.6M |
| Q4 25 | -0.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | -0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.2% | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.3% | -6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.8% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | 3.1% |
| Q4 25 | 4.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.41× | 2.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.07× | 8.96× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.63× | 0.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.91× | 5.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.34× | -2.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.07× | 3.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.02× | 0.44× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.25× | 1.64× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FN
| Optical Communications | $832.6M | 73% |
| Non Optical Communications | $300.3M | 27% |
UPBD
Segment breakdown not available.