vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (FNF) and JBT Marel Corp (JBTM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
JBT Marel Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0B vs $544.0M, roughly 1.9× Fidelity National Financial, Inc.). JBT Marel Corp runs the higher net margin — 5.3% vs -21.5%, a 26.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JBT Marel Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (115.6% vs 10.3%). Over the past eight quarters, JBT Marel Corp's revenue compounded faster (60.3% CAGR vs 13.7%).
Fidelity National Financial, Inc., is an American provider of title insurance and settlement services to the real estate and mortgage industries. A Fortune 500 company, Fidelity National Financial generated approximately $8.469 billion in annual revenue in 2019 from its title and real estate-related operations. The company was the first instance of an attorney licensed by a Native American Tribe being certified as "authorized house counsel" in the state of Florida.
JBT Marel Corporation, formerly known as JBT Corporation, or John Bean Technologies Corporation, is a food processing machinery and automated vehicle company. The company was incorporated in 2008 when FMC Technologies divested its non-energy businesses. The company is based in Chicago, Illinois and traces its history back to a company founded in 1884 by John Bean, an orchardist in Los Gatos, California.
FNF vs JBTM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $544.0M | $1.0B |
| Net Profit | $-117.0M | $53.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.5% |
| Operating Margin | 82.9% | 7.2% |
| Net Margin | -21.5% | 5.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.3% | 115.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -126.0% | 858.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.44 | $1.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $544.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $553.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $547.0M | $934.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $455.0M | $854.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $493.0M | $467.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.0M | $453.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $504.0M | $402.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $421.0M | $392.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-117.0M | $53.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $358.0M | $66.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $278.0M | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.0M | $-173.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $450.0M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $266.0M | $38.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $306.0M | $30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $248.0M | $22.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 34.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 35.8% |
| Q4 25 | 82.9% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 81.9% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.8% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.4% | -3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.9% | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 90.9% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 78.6% | 7.4% |
| Q4 25 | -21.5% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 64.7% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.2% | -20.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 91.3% | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.6% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.7% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 58.9% | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.44 | $1.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.33 | $1.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.02 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $-3.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.65 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $1.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.12 | $0.95 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.91 | $0.71 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.6B | $167.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.4B | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.4B | $4.5B |
| Total Assets | $109.0B | $8.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.59× | 0.33× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $167.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2B | $648.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $647.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9B | $647.0M |
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.9B | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $109.0B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.6B | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $102.3B | $8.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.2B | $8.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $95.4B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $94.7B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.8B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $84.5B | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | 0.59× | 0.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | 0.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.56× | 0.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | 0.48× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.56× | 0.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.52× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.58× | 0.43× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.55× | 0.43× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.5B | $117.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $83.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 8.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $238.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $117.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $87.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $102.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $34.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $128.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $71.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $21.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $10.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $56.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $83.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $118.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $65.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-100.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.66× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.82× | 30.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.43× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.32× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.89× | 1.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.45× | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.42× | 0.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FNF
| Escrow Fees | $241.0M | 44% |
| Other Title Related Fees And Income | $182.0M | 33% |
| Service Link Excluding Title Premiums Escrow Fees And Subservicing Fees | $87.0M | 16% |
| Insurance Contracts Home Warranty | $31.0M | 6% |
JBTM
Segment breakdown not available.
