vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (FNF) and MODINE MANUFACTURING CO (MOD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MODINE MANUFACTURING CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($805.0M vs $544.0M, roughly 1.5× Fidelity National Financial, Inc.). MODINE MANUFACTURING CO runs the higher net margin — -5.9% vs -21.5%, a 15.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MODINE MANUFACTURING CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.5% vs 10.3%). Over the past eight quarters, MODINE MANUFACTURING CO's revenue compounded faster (15.5% CAGR vs 13.7%).
Fidelity National Financial, Inc., is an American provider of title insurance and settlement services to the real estate and mortgage industries. A Fortune 500 company, Fidelity National Financial generated approximately $8.469 billion in annual revenue in 2019 from its title and real estate-related operations. The company was the first instance of an attorney licensed by a Native American Tribe being certified as "authorized house counsel" in the state of Florida.
Modine Manufacturing is a thermal management company established in 1916 in the United States. The company started as Modine Manufacturing Company by Arthur B Modine who patented the Spirex radiator for tractors. The Modine company manufactured the Turbotube radiator for Ford Model T cars. The company built the world's first vehicular wind tunnel in Racine, Wisconsin in 1941. During WWII, Modine manufactured aftercoolers for the P-51 Mustang fighter plane. After WWII, Modine introduced the Ai...
FNF vs MOD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $544.0M | $805.0M |
| Net Profit | $-117.0M | $-47.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 23.1% |
| Operating Margin | 82.9% | 11.1% |
| Net Margin | -21.5% | -5.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.3% | 30.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -126.0% | -215.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.44 | $-0.90 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $544.0M | $805.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $553.0M | $738.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $547.0M | $682.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $455.0M | $647.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $493.0M | $616.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.0M | $658.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $504.0M | $661.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $421.0M | $603.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-117.0M | $-47.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $358.0M | $44.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $278.0M | $51.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.0M | $49.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $450.0M | $41.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $266.0M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $306.0M | $47.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $248.0M | $25.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 25.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 22.4% |
| Q4 25 | 82.9% | 11.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 81.9% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.8% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.4% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.9% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 90.9% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 78.6% | 7.8% |
| Q4 25 | -21.5% | -5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 64.7% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.8% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.2% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 91.3% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.6% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.7% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 58.9% | 4.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.44 | $-0.90 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.33 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.02 | $0.95 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $0.92 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.65 | $0.76 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $0.86 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.12 | $0.88 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.91 | $0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.6B | $98.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.4B | $570.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.4B | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $109.0B | $2.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.59× | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $98.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | $83.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $124.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | $71.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $83.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $72.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $60.1M |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $570.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $525.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | $482.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | $296.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $330.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2B | $359.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $405.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9B | $399.9M |
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.9B | $910.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8B | $855.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1B | $858.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3B | $788.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $747.6M |
| Q4 25 | $109.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $102.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $95.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $94.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $84.5B | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.59× | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.56× | 0.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | 0.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.56× | 0.39× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.52× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.58× | 0.51× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.55× | 0.53× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.5B | $24.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-17.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -2.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-20.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $24.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $27.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $54.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $60.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $57.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $40.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $39.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-17.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-30.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $200.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $27.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $44.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $43.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | -2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.66× | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.82× | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.43× | 1.10× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.32× | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.89× | 1.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.45× | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.42× | 1.53× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FNF
| Escrow Fees | $241.0M | 44% |
| Other Title Related Fees And Income | $182.0M | 33% |
| Service Link Excluding Title Premiums Escrow Fees And Subservicing Fees | $87.0M | 16% |
| Insurance Contracts Home Warranty | $31.0M | 6% |
MOD
| Data Centers | $296.9M | 37% |
| Performance Technologies | $266.0M | 33% |
| Hvac Technologies | $107.1M | 13% |
| Air Cooled | $92.4M | 11% |
| Lb White | $25.6M | 3% |
| Climate By Design | $10.2M | 1% |
| Absolutaire | $7.0M | 1% |