vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Finward Bancorp (FNWD) and TANTECH HOLDINGS LTD (TANH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TANTECH HOLDINGS LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($21.5M vs $16.5M, roughly 1.3× Finward Bancorp). Finward Bancorp runs the higher net margin — 12.0% vs 8.2%, a 3.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Finward Bancorp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.1% vs -0.2%).
Finward Bancorp is a U.S.-headquartered regional bank holding company. It offers a full range of retail and commercial banking products and services, including deposit accounts, personal and mortgage loans, small business financing, and wealth management solutions, primarily serving individual customers and small to mid-sized enterprises in its local operating regions.
Tantech Holdings Ltd is a China-based specialty manufacturing enterprise focused on R&D, production and distribution of bamboo-derived carbon products, high-performance clean energy materials and eco-friendly consumer goods, serving customers across Chinese and global markets in consumer goods, industrial materials and new energy segments.
FNWD vs TANH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $16.5M | $21.5M |
| Net Profit | $2.0M | $1.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 22.2% |
| Operating Margin | 11.0% | 10.8% |
| Net Margin | 12.0% | 8.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.1% | -0.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -5.6% | 59.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.46 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $16.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.6M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $455.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $606.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.0K | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 22.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.46 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.81 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.03 | $0.21 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.17 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $35.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $174.7M | $128.3M |
| Total Assets | $2.0B | $143.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $35.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $34.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $174.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $165.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $154.3M | $128.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $151.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $159.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.6M | $126.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $151.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $143.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $142.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $9.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 54.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.99× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $10.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-25.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-736.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | 54.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -25.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -28.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.99× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.22× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.37× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.66× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.15× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.23× | 4.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.00× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FNWD
Segment breakdown not available.
TANH
| Revenue from China | $20.9M | 97% |
| Revenue directly from foreign countries | $602.2K | 3% |
