vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. (FOLD) and KILROY REALTY CORP (KRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KILROY REALTY CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($272.2M vs $185.2M, roughly 1.5× AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC.). KILROY REALTY CORP runs the higher net margin — 6.3% vs 0.9%, a 5.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.7% vs -5.0%). KILROY REALTY CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($450.3M vs $16.0M). Over the past eight quarters, AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (29.5% CAGR vs -1.2%).
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. is a public American biopharmaceutical company based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The company went public in 2007 under the Nasdaq trading symbol FOLD. This followed a 2006 planned offering and subsequent withdrawal, which would have established the trading symbol as AMTX Prior to their IPO, Amicus was funded by a variety of venture capital firms including Radius Ventures, Canaan Partners and New Enterprise Associates.
Kilroy Realty Corp is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust that develops, owns, and operates premium office, life science, and mixed-use properties primarily across high-growth West Coast markets including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and San Diego. It serves tenants across the technology, life sciences, media, and creative sectors, with a core focus on delivering sustainable, future-ready workspaces tailored to modern business needs.
FOLD vs KRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $185.2M | $272.2M |
| Net Profit | $1.7M | $17.1M |
| Gross Margin | 85.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.9% | 6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.7% | -5.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.5% | -73.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $185.2M | $272.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.1M | $279.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $154.7M | $289.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $125.2M | $270.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $149.7M | $286.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.5M | $289.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.7M | $280.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.4M | $278.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $17.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.3M | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.4M | $79.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.7M | $43.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.7M | $65.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.7M | $57.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.7M | $54.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-48.4M | $55.7M |
| Q4 25 | 85.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 88.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 90.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 90.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 90.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 91.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 87.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -25.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.2% | 58.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.8% | 27.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.3% | 16.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.8% | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.8% | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.4% | 19.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -43.9% | 20.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | $1.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.08 | $0.57 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $0.33 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.05 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.02 | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | $0.41 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.16 | $0.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $293.5M | $179.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $392.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $274.2M | $5.4B |
| Total Assets | $949.9M | $10.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.43× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $293.5M | $179.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $263.8M | $372.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $231.0M | $193.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $250.6M | $146.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $249.9M | $165.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $249.8M | $625.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.1M | $835.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $239.6M | $855.0M |
| Q4 25 | $392.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $392.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $391.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $390.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $390.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $389.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $388.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $388.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $274.2M | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $230.4M | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $204.3M | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $193.6M | $5.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $194.0M | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $178.8M | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $132.5M | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.7M | $5.4B |
| Q4 25 | $949.9M | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $868.8M | $11.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $815.3M | $10.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $789.8M | $10.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $785.0M | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $786.6M | $11.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $749.5M | $11.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $721.8M | $11.6B |
| Q4 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.70× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.92× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.02× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.93× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.97× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $16.3M | $566.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.0M | $450.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.6% | 165.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | 42.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 9.62× | 33.10× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $29.8M | $833.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $16.3M | $566.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.7M | $176.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.5M | $143.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $136.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.9M | $541.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.0M | $176.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.7M | $88.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-29.7M | $167.9M |
| Q4 25 | $16.0M | $450.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.3M | $148.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.9M | $118.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5M | $115.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.2M | $440.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.3M | $147.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | $69.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-31.5M | $151.9M |
| Q4 25 | 8.6% | 165.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.9% | 53.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.7% | 40.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 42.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | 153.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.5% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.0% | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.5% | 54.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 42.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 5.7% |
| Q4 25 | 9.62× | 33.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.06× | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.27× | 8.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FOLD
| Other | $105.8M | 57% |
| Galafold | $64.8M | 35% |
| Pombiliti Opfolda | $14.6M | 8% |
KRC
Segment breakdown not available.
