vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. (FOLD) and PRA GROUP INC (PRAA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PRA GROUP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($333.4M vs $185.2M, roughly 1.8× AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC.). PRA GROUP INC runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 0.9%, a 16.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.7% vs 13.7%). AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($16.0M vs $-90.4M). Over the past eight quarters, AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (29.5% CAGR vs 14.2%).
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. is a public American biopharmaceutical company based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The company went public in 2007 under the Nasdaq trading symbol FOLD. This followed a 2006 planned offering and subsequent withdrawal, which would have established the trading symbol as AMTX Prior to their IPO, Amicus was funded by a variety of venture capital firms including Radius Ventures, Canaan Partners and New Enterprise Associates.
PRA Group, Inc. is a publicly traded debt buyer and debt collection company based in Norfolk, Virginia. The company buys delinquent consumer debt from credit card issuers and other financial institutions at a discount and pursues collection of the full debt owed. Founded in 1996, PRA Group employs more than 3200 people in 18 countries.
FOLD vs PRAA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $185.2M | $333.4M |
| Net Profit | $1.7M | $56.5M |
| Gross Margin | 85.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | 37.7% |
| Net Margin | 0.9% | 17.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.7% | 13.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.5% | 206.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $1.47 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $185.2M | $333.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.1M | $311.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $154.7M | $287.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $125.2M | $269.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $149.7M | $293.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.5M | $281.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.7M | $284.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.4M | $255.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $56.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.3M | $-407.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.4M | $42.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.7M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.7M | $18.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.7M | $27.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.7M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-48.4M | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | 85.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 88.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 90.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 90.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 90.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 91.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 87.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.6% | 37.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.3% | -101.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.1% | 29.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.3% | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.3% | 32.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.8% | 31.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -25.1% | 26.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.2% | -131.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.8% | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.8% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.8% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.4% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -43.9% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | $1.47 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | $-10.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.08 | $1.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.05 | $0.47 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.02 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.16 | $0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $293.5M | $104.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $392.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $274.2M | $979.9M |
| Total Assets | $949.9M | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.43× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $293.5M | $104.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $263.8M | $107.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $231.0M | $131.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $250.6M | $128.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $249.9M | $105.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $249.8M | $141.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.1M | $118.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $239.6M | $108.1M |
| Q4 25 | $392.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $392.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $391.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $390.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $390.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $389.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $388.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $388.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $274.2M | $979.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $230.4M | $928.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $204.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $193.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $194.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $178.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $132.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.7M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $949.9M | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $868.8M | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $815.3M | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $789.8M | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $785.0M | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $786.6M | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $749.5M | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $721.8M | $4.5B |
| Q4 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.70× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.92× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.02× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.93× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.97× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $16.3M | $-85.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.0M | $-90.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.6% | -27.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 9.62× | -1.51× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $29.8M | $-169.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $16.3M | $-85.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.7M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.5M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $-52.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.9M | $-94.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.0M | $-35.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.7M | $-29.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-29.7M | $-73.0M |
| Q4 25 | $16.0M | $-90.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.3M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.9M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5M | $-53.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.2M | $-98.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.3M | $-36.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | $-30.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-31.5M | $-73.5M |
| Q4 25 | 8.6% | -27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.9% | -3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.7% | -4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | -19.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | -33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.5% | -12.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.0% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.5% | -28.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | 9.62× | -1.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.30× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -14.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.27× | -5.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -21.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FOLD
| Other | $105.8M | 57% |
| Galafold | $64.8M | 35% |
| Pombiliti Opfolda | $14.6M | 8% |
PRAA
| GB | $170.1M | 51% |
| Other | $163.3M | 49% |
