vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. (FOLD) and Urban Edge Properties (UE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($185.2M vs $132.6M, roughly 1.4× Urban Edge Properties). Urban Edge Properties runs the higher net margin — 17.1% vs 0.9%, a 16.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.7% vs 12.2%). Over the past eight quarters, AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (29.5% CAGR vs 11.6%).
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. is a public American biopharmaceutical company based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The company went public in 2007 under the Nasdaq trading symbol FOLD. This followed a 2006 planned offering and subsequent withdrawal, which would have established the trading symbol as AMTX Prior to their IPO, Amicus was funded by a variety of venture capital firms including Radius Ventures, Canaan Partners and New Enterprise Associates.
Urban Edge Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and develops high-quality retail and mixed-use properties, primarily located in densely populated urban and suburban markets across the United States. Its portfolio covers grocery-anchored shopping centers, lifestyle outlets, and community-focused commercial assets.
FOLD vs UE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $185.2M | $132.6M |
| Net Profit | $1.7M | $22.6M |
| Gross Margin | 85.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.9% | 17.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.7% | 12.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -88.5% | -6.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $132.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $185.2M | $119.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.1M | $120.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $154.7M | $114.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $125.2M | $118.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $149.7M | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.5M | $112.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.7M | $106.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.3M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.4M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.7M | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.7M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.7M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.7M | $30.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 85.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 88.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 90.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 90.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 90.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 91.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.6% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.3% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.1% | 53.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.3% | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.3% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.8% | 30.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.2% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.8% | 50.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.3% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.8% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.8% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.4% | 28.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.08 | $0.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.05 | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.02 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $293.5M | $50.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $392.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $274.2M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $949.9M | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.43× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $293.5M | $48.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $263.8M | $77.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $231.0M | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $250.6M | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $249.9M | $41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $249.8M | $67.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.1M | $78.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $392.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $392.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $391.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $390.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $390.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $389.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $388.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $274.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $230.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $204.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $193.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $194.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $178.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $132.5M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $949.9M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $868.8M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $815.3M | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $789.8M | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $785.0M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $786.6M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $749.5M | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.70× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.92× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.02× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.93× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $16.3M | $39.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 9.62× | 1.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $29.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $39.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.3M | $182.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.7M | $55.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.5M | $43.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.9M | $153.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.0M | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.7M | $41.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.0M | $81.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.3M | $26.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.9M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.2M | $42.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.3M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | $19.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.6% | 68.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.9% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.7% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.5% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.0% | 18.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 84.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 95.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 20.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.62× | 14.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.06× | 3.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.27× | 5.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FOLD
| Other | $105.8M | 57% |
| Galafold | $64.8M | 35% |
| Pombiliti Opfolda | $14.6M | 8% |
UE
| Rental revenue | $124.2M | 94% |
| Other | $8.4M | 6% |
