vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FONAR CORP (FONR) and La Rosa Holdings Corp. (LRHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FONAR CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.5M vs $20.2M, roughly 1.3× La Rosa Holdings Corp.). FONAR CORP runs the higher net margin — 8.0% vs -27.4%, a 35.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, La Rosa Holdings Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs 2.4%). Over the past eight quarters, La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (72.5% CAGR vs -0.3%).
FONAR Corp is a specialized medical technology firm that designs, manufactures, and distributes innovative MRI systems including upright and open models. It primarily serves U.S. hospitals, diagnostic imaging centers, and healthcare providers, delivering high-precision scanning solutions for clinical diagnostic use.
V. La Rosa and Sons Macaroni Company was founded in 1914 by Vincenzo La Rosa, a Sicilian immigrant. The company eventually became one of the largest regional brands in the United States producing over 40 varieties of pasta.
FONR vs LRHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.5M | $20.2M |
| Net Profit | $2.1M | $-5.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 8.4% |
| Operating Margin | 13.5% | -24.7% |
| Net Margin | 8.0% | -27.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.4% | 3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4.7% | -125.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-5.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $25.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.0M | $20.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.3M | $23.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.2M | $17.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.9M | $17.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.0M | $19.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.9M | $19.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.7M | $13.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $729.3K | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5M | $-95.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $830.4K | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $-4.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.9% |
| Q4 25 | 13.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.1% | -24.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | -10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | -26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.9% | -17.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | -9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.8% | -35.0% |
| Q4 25 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.7% | -27.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 337.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.2% | -546.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.9% | -28.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | -12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | -12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.3% | -35.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-5.44 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.86 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $28.54 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-16.49 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-12.49 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $121.0K | $4.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $642.8K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $176.9M | $1.6M |
| Total Assets | $217.2M | $21.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.41× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $121.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.0K | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.5M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $123.0K | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.0K | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.0K | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.5M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $134.0K | $1.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $642.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $644.3K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $645.9K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $647.6K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $649.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.9K | $650.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $652.4K |
| Q4 25 | $176.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $174.9M | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $172.6M | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $171.9M | $-87.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $169.8M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $168.7M | $5.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $166.0M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $165.8M | $5.6M |
| Q4 25 | $217.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.4M | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $216.9M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.9M | $21.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $208.0M | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $212.3M | $19.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $214.2M | $18.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $209.6M | $16.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | 0.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.12× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $171.0K | $-1.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-227.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.08× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $5.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $171.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $-591.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6M | $-803.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8M | $-538.3K |
| Q4 25 | $-227.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-177.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-148.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.79× | -0.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.26× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.54× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.50× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FONR
| Managementof Diagnostic Imaging Centers | $23.2M | 91% |
| Manufacturingand Servicingof Medical Equipment | $2.4M | 9% |
LRHC
| Real Estate Residential Brokerage Services | $16.8M | 83% |
| Transferred Over Time | $3.5M | 17% |
