vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) and FORMFACTOR INC (FORM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Forestar Group Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($273.0M vs $226.1M, roughly 1.2× FORMFACTOR INC). FORMFACTOR INC runs the higher net margin — 9.0% vs 5.6%, a 3.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FORMFACTOR INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.0% vs 9.0%). FORMFACTOR INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($30.7M vs $-157.1M). Over the past eight quarters, FORMFACTOR INC's revenue compounded faster (7.0% CAGR vs -9.6%).

Forestar Group Inc. is a residential lot development company based in Arlington, Texas. The company has operations in 51 markets in 21 states and delivered 11,518 residential lots during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2020. The company is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange and in October 2017 became a majority-owned subsidiary of D.R. Horton, Inc., the largest homebuilder by volume in the United States since 2002. The company primarily acquires entitled real estate and...

Formfactor, Inc. is a provider of test and measurement technologies for integrated circuits, with its headquarters in Livermore, California. It provides semiconductor companies with products to improve device performance and provide test and measurement technologies for integrated circuits.

FOR vs FORM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
FOR
FOR
1.2× larger
FOR
$273.0M
$226.1M
FORM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
FORM
FORM
+22.9% gap
FORM
32.0%
9.0%
FOR
Higher net margin
FORM
FORM
3.4% more per $
FORM
9.0%
5.6%
FOR
More free cash flow
FORM
FORM
$187.8M more FCF
FORM
$30.7M
$-157.1M
FOR
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
FORM
FORM
Annualised
FORM
7.0%
-9.6%
FOR

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
FOR
FOR
FORM
FORM
Revenue
$273.0M
$226.1M
Net Profit
$15.4M
$20.4M
Gross Margin
20.1%
38.4%
Operating Margin
7.6%
7.4%
Net Margin
5.6%
9.0%
Revenue YoY
9.0%
32.0%
Net Profit YoY
-6.7%
218.5%
EPS (diluted)
$0.30
$0.26

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FOR
FOR
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
$226.1M
Q4 25
$273.0M
$215.2M
Q3 25
$670.5M
$202.7M
Q2 25
$390.5M
$195.8M
Q1 25
$351.0M
$171.4M
Q4 24
$250.4M
$189.5M
Q3 24
$551.3M
$207.9M
Q2 24
$318.4M
$197.5M
Net Profit
FOR
FOR
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
$20.4M
Q4 25
$15.4M
$23.2M
Q3 25
$86.9M
$15.7M
Q2 25
$32.9M
$9.1M
Q1 25
$31.6M
$6.4M
Q4 24
$16.5M
$9.7M
Q3 24
$81.5M
$18.7M
Q2 24
$38.7M
$19.4M
Gross Margin
FOR
FOR
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
38.4%
Q4 25
20.1%
42.2%
Q3 25
22.3%
39.8%
Q2 25
20.4%
37.3%
Q1 25
22.6%
37.7%
Q4 24
22.0%
38.8%
Q3 24
23.9%
40.7%
Q2 24
22.5%
44.0%
Operating Margin
FOR
FOR
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
7.4%
Q4 25
7.6%
10.9%
Q3 25
16.9%
8.9%
Q2 25
11.2%
6.3%
Q1 25
11.6%
1.9%
Q4 24
8.7%
4.1%
Q3 24
19.7%
8.6%
Q2 24
16.2%
9.0%
Net Margin
FOR
FOR
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
9.0%
Q4 25
5.6%
10.8%
Q3 25
13.0%
7.7%
Q2 25
8.4%
4.6%
Q1 25
9.0%
3.7%
Q4 24
6.6%
5.1%
Q3 24
14.8%
9.0%
Q2 24
12.2%
9.8%
EPS (diluted)
FOR
FOR
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
$0.26
Q4 25
$0.30
$0.29
Q3 25
$1.70
$0.20
Q2 25
$0.65
$0.12
Q1 25
$0.62
$0.08
Q4 24
$0.32
$0.12
Q3 24
$1.59
$0.24
Q2 24
$0.76
$0.25

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FOR
FOR
FORM
FORM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$211.7M
$123.5M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$793.2M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.8B
$1.1B
Total Assets
$3.2B
$1.3B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.44×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FOR
FOR
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
$123.5M
Q4 25
$211.7M
$103.3M
Q3 25
$379.2M
$266.0M
Q2 25
$189.2M
$249.3M
Q1 25
$174.3M
$299.0M
Q4 24
$132.0M
$360.0M
Q3 24
$481.2M
$354.5M
Q2 24
$359.2M
$357.6M
Total Debt
FOR
FOR
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$793.2M
$12.2M
Q3 25
$802.7M
Q2 25
$872.8M
Q1 25
$872.5M
Q4 24
$806.8M
$13.3M
Q3 24
$706.4M
Q2 24
$706.1M
Stockholders' Equity
FOR
FOR
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
$1.1B
Q4 25
$1.8B
$1.0B
Q3 25
$1.8B
$1.0B
Q2 25
$1.7B
$990.0M
Q1 25
$1.6B
$965.9M
Q4 24
$1.6B
$947.8M
Q3 24
$1.6B
$955.0M
Q2 24
$1.5B
$947.9M
Total Assets
FOR
FOR
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
$1.3B
Q4 25
$3.2B
$1.2B
Q3 25
$3.1B
$1.2B
Q2 25
$3.1B
$1.2B
Q1 25
$3.0B
$1.2B
Q4 24
$3.0B
$1.1B
Q3 24
$2.8B
$1.2B
Q2 24
$2.7B
$1.2B
Debt / Equity
FOR
FOR
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.44×
0.01×
Q3 25
0.45×
Q2 25
0.52×
Q1 25
0.53×
Q4 24
0.50×
0.01×
Q3 24
0.44×
Q2 24
0.47×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FOR
FOR
FORM
FORM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-157.0M
$45.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-157.1M
$30.7M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-57.5%
13.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
6.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-10.19×
2.21×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$93.0M
$37.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FOR
FOR
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
$45.0M
Q4 25
$-157.0M
$46.0M
Q3 25
$256.3M
$27.0M
Q2 25
$15.8M
$18.9M
Q1 25
$-19.8M
$23.5M
Q4 24
$-450.0M
$35.9M
Q3 24
$119.2M
$26.7M
Q2 24
$-61.7M
$21.9M
Free Cash Flow
FOR
FOR
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
$30.7M
Q4 25
$-157.1M
$34.7M
Q3 25
$255.6M
$19.5M
Q2 25
$15.0M
$-47.4M
Q1 25
$-20.5M
$5.0M
Q4 24
$28.3M
Q3 24
$118.4M
$17.8M
Q2 24
$-62.3M
$13.5M
FCF Margin
FOR
FOR
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
13.6%
Q4 25
-57.5%
16.1%
Q3 25
38.1%
9.6%
Q2 25
3.8%
-24.2%
Q1 25
-5.8%
2.9%
Q4 24
14.9%
Q3 24
21.5%
8.6%
Q2 24
-19.6%
6.8%
Capex Intensity
FOR
FOR
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
6.7%
Q4 25
0.0%
5.3%
Q3 25
0.1%
3.7%
Q2 25
0.2%
33.8%
Q1 25
0.2%
10.8%
Q4 24
0.0%
4.0%
Q3 24
0.1%
4.3%
Q2 24
0.2%
4.3%
Cash Conversion
FOR
FOR
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
2.21×
Q4 25
-10.19×
1.98×
Q3 25
2.95×
1.72×
Q2 25
0.48×
2.08×
Q1 25
-0.63×
3.68×
Q4 24
-27.27×
3.70×
Q3 24
1.46×
1.43×
Q2 24
-1.59×
1.13×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FOR
FOR

D.R.Horton Inc.$183.8M67%
Other$89.2M33%

FORM
FORM

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons