vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) and Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Hayward Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($349.4M vs $273.0M, roughly 1.3× Forestar Group Inc.). Hayward Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 19.6% vs 5.6%, a 13.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Forestar Group Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.0% vs -66.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (10.8% CAGR vs -9.6%).

Forestar Group Inc. is a residential lot development company based in Arlington, Texas. The company has operations in 51 markets in 21 states and delivered 11,518 residential lots during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2020. The company is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange and in October 2017 became a majority-owned subsidiary of D.R. Horton, Inc., the largest homebuilder by volume in the United States since 2002. The company primarily acquires entitled real estate and...

Bartlett-Hayward Company was an American metalworking company with large foundry, fabrication, and construction business lines, located in Baltimore, Maryland. Founded in the 1830s, it was independent until 1925 and since 1927 was owned by Koppers, of which it remained a division long afterward.

FOR vs HAYW — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
HAYW
HAYW
1.3× larger
HAYW
$349.4M
$273.0M
FOR
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
FOR
FOR
+75.8% gap
FOR
9.0%
-66.8%
HAYW
Higher net margin
HAYW
HAYW
13.9% more per $
HAYW
19.6%
5.6%
FOR
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
HAYW
HAYW
Annualised
HAYW
10.8%
-9.6%
FOR

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
FOR
FOR
HAYW
HAYW
Revenue
$273.0M
$349.4M
Net Profit
$15.4M
$68.4M
Gross Margin
20.1%
48.5%
Operating Margin
7.6%
25.0%
Net Margin
5.6%
19.6%
Revenue YoY
9.0%
-66.8%
Net Profit YoY
-6.7%
-42.3%
EPS (diluted)
$0.30
$0.31

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FOR
FOR
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
$349.4M
Q4 25
$273.0M
$349.4M
Q3 25
$670.5M
$244.3M
Q2 25
$390.5M
$299.6M
Q1 25
$351.0M
$228.8M
Q4 24
$250.4M
$327.1M
Q3 24
$551.3M
$227.6M
Q2 24
$318.4M
$284.4M
Net Profit
FOR
FOR
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
$68.4M
Q4 25
$15.4M
$68.4M
Q3 25
$86.9M
$24.0M
Q2 25
$32.9M
$44.8M
Q1 25
$31.6M
$14.3M
Q4 24
$16.5M
$54.7M
Q3 24
$81.5M
$16.5M
Q2 24
$38.7M
$37.6M
Gross Margin
FOR
FOR
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
48.5%
Q4 25
20.1%
40.7%
Q3 25
22.3%
51.2%
Q2 25
20.4%
52.7%
Q1 25
22.6%
49.5%
Q4 24
22.0%
51.4%
Q3 24
23.9%
49.7%
Q2 24
22.5%
51.0%
Operating Margin
FOR
FOR
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
25.0%
Q4 25
7.6%
25.0%
Q3 25
16.9%
16.8%
Q2 25
11.2%
23.8%
Q1 25
11.6%
14.6%
Q4 24
8.7%
23.4%
Q3 24
19.7%
14.7%
Q2 24
16.2%
23.9%
Net Margin
FOR
FOR
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
19.6%
Q4 25
5.6%
19.6%
Q3 25
13.0%
9.8%
Q2 25
8.4%
15.0%
Q1 25
9.0%
6.3%
Q4 24
6.6%
16.7%
Q3 24
14.8%
7.3%
Q2 24
12.2%
13.2%
EPS (diluted)
FOR
FOR
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
$0.31
Q4 25
$0.30
$0.31
Q3 25
$1.70
$0.11
Q2 25
$0.65
$0.20
Q1 25
$0.62
$0.06
Q4 24
$0.32
$0.26
Q3 24
$1.59
$0.07
Q2 24
$0.76
$0.17

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FOR
FOR
HAYW
HAYW
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$211.7M
$399.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$793.2M
$13.3M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.8B
$1.6B
Total Assets
$3.2B
$3.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.44×
0.01×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FOR
FOR
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
$399.1M
Q4 25
$211.7M
$399.1M
Q3 25
$379.2M
$448.3M
Q2 25
$189.2M
$365.1M
Q1 25
$174.3M
$181.3M
Q4 24
$132.0M
$196.6M
Q3 24
$481.2M
$274.2M
Q2 24
$359.2M
$215.1M
Total Debt
FOR
FOR
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
$13.3M
Q4 25
$793.2M
$943.5M
Q3 25
$802.7M
$947.7M
Q2 25
$872.8M
$949.1M
Q1 25
$872.5M
$950.4M
Q4 24
$806.8M
$950.6M
Q3 24
$706.4M
$959.9M
Q2 24
$706.1M
$959.8M
Stockholders' Equity
FOR
FOR
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
$1.6B
Q4 25
$1.8B
$1.6B
Q3 25
$1.8B
$1.5B
Q2 25
$1.7B
$1.5B
Q1 25
$1.6B
$1.4B
Q4 24
$1.6B
$1.4B
Q3 24
$1.6B
$1.4B
Q2 24
$1.5B
$1.4B
Total Assets
FOR
FOR
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
$3.2B
Q4 25
$3.2B
$3.2B
Q3 25
$3.1B
$3.0B
Q2 25
$3.1B
$3.0B
Q1 25
$3.0B
$3.0B
Q4 24
$3.0B
$3.0B
Q3 24
$2.8B
$2.9B
Q2 24
$2.7B
$2.9B
Debt / Equity
FOR
FOR
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
0.01×
Q4 25
0.44×
0.59×
Q3 25
0.45×
0.62×
Q2 25
0.52×
0.63×
Q1 25
0.53×
0.66×
Q4 24
0.50×
0.67×
Q3 24
0.44×
0.70×
Q2 24
0.47×
0.71×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FOR
FOR
HAYW
HAYW
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-157.0M
$256.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-157.1M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-57.5%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-10.19×
3.74×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$93.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FOR
FOR
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
$256.0M
Q4 25
$-157.0M
$-26.9M
Q3 25
$256.3M
$94.6M
Q2 25
$15.8M
$194.2M
Q1 25
$-19.8M
$-5.8M
Q4 24
$-450.0M
$-63.7M
Q3 24
$119.2M
$65.9M
Q2 24
$-61.7M
$287.0M
Free Cash Flow
FOR
FOR
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-157.1M
$-35.8M
Q3 25
$255.6M
$87.2M
Q2 25
$15.0M
$187.3M
Q1 25
$-20.5M
$-11.4M
Q4 24
$-70.4M
Q3 24
$118.4M
$59.1M
Q2 24
$-62.3M
$282.3M
FCF Margin
FOR
FOR
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
Q4 25
-57.5%
-10.3%
Q3 25
38.1%
35.7%
Q2 25
3.8%
62.5%
Q1 25
-5.8%
-5.0%
Q4 24
-21.5%
Q3 24
21.5%
26.0%
Q2 24
-19.6%
99.3%
Capex Intensity
FOR
FOR
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.0%
2.5%
Q3 25
0.1%
3.0%
Q2 25
0.2%
2.3%
Q1 25
0.2%
2.4%
Q4 24
0.0%
2.1%
Q3 24
0.1%
3.0%
Q2 24
0.2%
1.7%
Cash Conversion
FOR
FOR
HAYW
HAYW
Q1 26
3.74×
Q4 25
-10.19×
-0.39×
Q3 25
2.95×
3.94×
Q2 25
0.48×
4.34×
Q1 25
-0.63×
-0.41×
Q4 24
-27.27×
-1.16×
Q3 24
1.46×
4.00×
Q2 24
-1.59×
7.64×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FOR
FOR

D.R.Horton Inc.$183.8M67%
Other$89.2M33%

HAYW
HAYW

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons