vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) and Hess Midstream LP (HESM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hess Midstream LP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($404.2M vs $273.0M, roughly 1.5× Forestar Group Inc.). Hess Midstream LP runs the higher net margin — 23.1% vs 5.6%, a 17.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Forestar Group Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.0% vs 2.1%). Hess Midstream LP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($178.9M vs $-157.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Hess Midstream LP's revenue compounded faster (6.6% CAGR vs -9.6%).
Forestar Group Inc. is a residential lot development company based in Arlington, Texas. The company has operations in 51 markets in 21 states and delivered 11,518 residential lots during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2020. The company is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange and in October 2017 became a majority-owned subsidiary of D.R. Horton, Inc., the largest homebuilder by volume in the United States since 2002. The company primarily acquires entitled real estate and...
Hess Corporation is an American global independent energy company involved in the exploration and production of crude oil and natural gas. It was formed by the merger of Hess Oil and Chemical and Amerada Petroleum in 1968. Leon Hess was CEO from the early 1960s until 1995, after which his son John B Hess succeeded him as chairman and CEO. The company agreed to be acquired by rival oil company Chevron in October 2023, and the acquisition closed in July 2025.
FOR vs HESM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $273.0M | $404.2M |
| Net Profit | $15.4M | $93.3M |
| Gross Margin | 20.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 7.6% | 62.2% |
| Net Margin | 5.6% | 23.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.0% | 2.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -6.7% | 32.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.30 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $273.0M | $404.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $670.5M | $420.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $390.5M | $414.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $351.0M | $382.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $250.4M | $395.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $551.3M | $378.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $318.4M | $365.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $333.8M | $355.6M |
| Q4 25 | $15.4M | $93.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.9M | $97.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.9M | $90.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.6M | $71.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.5M | $70.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.5M | $58.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.7M | $49.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.0M | $44.6M |
| Q4 25 | 20.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 62.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.9% | 61.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | 62.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.6% | 62.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 61.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | 61.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.2% | 60.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.6% | 62.4% |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.0% | 23.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | 21.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.8% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.2% | 13.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.5% | 12.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.30 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.70 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.65 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.62 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.59 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.76 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.89 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $211.7M | $1.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $793.2M | $3.8B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.8B | — |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $211.7M | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $379.2M | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.2M | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $174.3M | $6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $132.0M | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $481.2M | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $359.2M | $99.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $416.2M | $4.2M |
| Q4 25 | $793.2M | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $802.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $872.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $872.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $806.8M | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $706.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $706.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $705.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $3.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.48× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-157.0M | $245.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-157.1M | $178.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -57.5% | 44.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 16.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -10.19× | 2.63× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $93.0M | $728.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-157.0M | $245.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $256.3M | $258.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.8M | $276.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-19.8M | $202.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-450.0M | $258.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.2M | $224.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-61.7M | $271.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-59.2M | $185.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-157.1M | $178.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.6M | $178.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.0M | $213.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.5M | $156.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $163.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $118.4M | $132.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-62.3M | $207.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-59.8M | $130.5M |
| Q4 25 | -57.5% | 44.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.1% | 42.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 51.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.8% | 41.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 41.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.5% | 35.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -19.6% | 56.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -17.9% | 36.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 19.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 15.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 11.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 24.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 17.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | -10.19× | 2.63× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 2.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.48× | 3.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.63× | 2.83× | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.27× | 3.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.46× | 3.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.59× | 5.49× | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.32× | 4.15× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FOR
| D.R.Horton Inc. | $183.8M | 67% |
| Other | $89.2M | 33% |
HESM
| Gathering | $217.3M | 54% |
| Processing And Storage | $154.7M | 38% |
| Terminaling And Export | $32.2M | 8% |
