vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) and KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC (KLIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Forestar Group Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($273.0M vs $199.6M, roughly 1.4× KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC). KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 8.4% vs 5.6%, a 2.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.2% vs 9.0%). KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-11.6M vs $-157.1M).
Forestar Group Inc. is a residential lot development company based in Arlington, Texas. The company has operations in 51 markets in 21 states and delivered 11,518 residential lots during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2020. The company is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange and in October 2017 became a majority-owned subsidiary of D.R. Horton, Inc., the largest homebuilder by volume in the United States since 2002. The company primarily acquires entitled real estate and...
Kulicke & Soffa Industries Inc. is a leading global provider of semiconductor packaging and assembly equipment, materials, and process solutions. It serves semiconductor manufacturers across automotive electronics, consumer devices, industrial systems, and high-performance computing markets, with core offerings covering wire bonding and advanced packaging technologies.
FOR vs KLIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $273.0M | $199.6M |
| Net Profit | $15.4M | $16.8M |
| Gross Margin | 20.1% | 49.6% |
| Operating Margin | 7.6% | 8.9% |
| Net Margin | 5.6% | 8.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.0% | 20.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -6.7% | -79.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.30 | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $199.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $273.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $670.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $390.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $351.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $250.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $551.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $318.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $16.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 49.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.30 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.70 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.65 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.62 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.59 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.76 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $211.7M | $481.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $793.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.8B | $825.0M |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $481.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $211.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $379.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $174.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $132.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $481.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $359.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $793.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $802.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $872.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $872.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $806.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $706.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $706.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $825.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.47× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-157.0M | $-8.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-157.1M | $-11.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -57.5% | -5.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 1.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -10.19× | -0.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $93.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-8.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-157.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $256.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-19.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-450.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-61.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $-11.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-157.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-62.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -5.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | -57.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -19.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -0.53× | ||
| Q4 25 | -10.19× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.27× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.46× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.59× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FOR
| D.R.Horton Inc. | $183.8M | 67% |
| Other | $89.2M | 33% |
KLIC
| Ball Bonding Equipment Segment | $110.3M | 55% |
| Aftermarket Products And Services APS Segment Post Cessation | $45.1M | 23% |
| Wedge Bonding Equipment Segment | $21.1M | 11% |
| Automotiveand Industrial | $13.6M | 7% |
| All Others Segment | $11.4M | 6% |
