vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) and Purple Innovation, Inc. (PRPL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Forestar Group Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($273.0M vs $140.7M, roughly 1.9× Purple Innovation, Inc.). Forestar Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.6% vs -2.3%, a 7.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Purple Innovation, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.1% vs 9.0%). Purple Innovation, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-7.8M vs $-157.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Purple Innovation, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (8.3% CAGR vs -9.6%).
Forestar Group Inc. is a residential lot development company based in Arlington, Texas. The company has operations in 51 markets in 21 states and delivered 11,518 residential lots during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2020. The company is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange and in October 2017 became a majority-owned subsidiary of D.R. Horton, Inc., the largest homebuilder by volume in the United States since 2002. The company primarily acquires entitled real estate and...
Purple Carrot is a Needham, Massachusetts-based, and 100% plant-based meal kit company. Founded by Andy Levitt, it offers both prepared meals as well as meal kits to subscribers weekly. As stated in a 2022 article in Cosmopolitan, “each Purple Carrot meal kit results in 72% less carbon being released into the atmosphere as compared to the standard American meal.”
FOR vs PRPL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $273.0M | $140.7M |
| Net Profit | $15.4M | $-3.2M |
| Gross Margin | 20.1% | 41.9% |
| Operating Margin | 7.6% | -1.6% |
| Net Margin | 5.6% | -2.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.0% | 9.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -6.7% | 62.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.30 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $273.0M | $140.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $670.5M | $118.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $390.5M | $105.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $351.0M | $104.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $250.4M | $129.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $551.3M | $118.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $318.4M | $120.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $333.8M | $120.0M |
| Q4 25 | $15.4M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.9M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.9M | $-17.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.6M | $-19.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.5M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.5M | $-39.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.7M | $27.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.0M | $-50.2M |
| Q4 25 | 20.1% | 41.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.3% | 42.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | 35.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.6% | 39.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.0% | 42.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.9% | 29.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.5% | 40.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.9% | 34.8% |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.9% | -10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | -13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.6% | -13.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | -6.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | -39.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.2% | -12.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.6% | -19.3% |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.0% | -9.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | -16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | -18.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.8% | -33.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.5% | -41.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.30 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.70 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.65 | $0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.62 | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.32 | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.59 | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.76 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.89 | $0.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $211.7M | $24.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $793.2M | $126.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.8B | $-29.7M |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $296.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $211.7M | $24.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $379.2M | $32.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.2M | $34.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $174.3M | $21.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $132.0M | $29.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $481.2M | $23.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $359.2M | $23.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $416.2M | $34.5M |
| Q4 25 | $793.2M | $126.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $802.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $872.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $872.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $806.8M | $70.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $706.4M | $50.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $706.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $705.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $-29.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $-26.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $-15.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $20.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $28.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $66.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $65.5M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $296.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $302.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $303.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $293.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $307.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $309.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $362.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $382.1M |
| Q4 25 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.50× | 3.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.44× | 1.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.48× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-157.0M | $-5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-157.1M | $-7.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -57.5% | -5.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -10.19× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $93.0M | $-41.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-157.0M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $256.3M | $-968.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.8M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-19.8M | $-23.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-450.0M | $6.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.2M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-61.7M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-59.2M | $-16.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-157.1M | $-7.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.6M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.0M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.5M | $-25.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $118.4M | $101.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-62.3M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-59.8M | $-19.9M |
| Q4 25 | -57.5% | -5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.1% | -1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | -6.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.8% | -24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -19.6% | -9.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -17.9% | -16.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 2.5% |
| Q4 25 | -10.19× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.27× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.46× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.59× | -330.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.32× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FOR
| D.R.Horton Inc. | $183.8M | 67% |
| Other | $89.2M | 33% |
PRPL
| Cost Of Revenues | $81.7M | 58% |
| Other | $59.0M | 42% |
