vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) and TRIMAS CORP (TRS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Forestar Group Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($273.0M vs $256.5M, roughly 1.1× TRIMAS CORP). TRIMAS CORP runs the higher net margin — 31.9% vs 5.6%, a 26.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Forestar Group Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.0% vs 3.8%). TRIMAS CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($36.8M vs $-157.1M). Over the past eight quarters, TRIMAS CORP's revenue compounded faster (3.3% CAGR vs -9.6%).
Forestar Group Inc. is a residential lot development company based in Arlington, Texas. The company has operations in 51 markets in 21 states and delivered 11,518 residential lots during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2020. The company is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange and in October 2017 became a majority-owned subsidiary of D.R. Horton, Inc., the largest homebuilder by volume in the United States since 2002. The company primarily acquires entitled real estate and...
Trimas Corp is a diversified industrial manufacturing enterprise that designs, produces and distributes a wide portfolio of engineered products, including specialized fasteners, aerospace components, custom packaging solutions, and consumer & industrial hardware. It primarily serves aerospace, automotive, construction, consumer goods and industrial sectors, with core operations across North America and selected global markets.
FOR vs TRS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $273.0M | $256.5M |
| Net Profit | $15.4M | $81.7M |
| Gross Margin | 20.1% | 12.8% |
| Operating Margin | 7.6% | 5.7% |
| Net Margin | 5.6% | 31.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.0% | 3.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -6.7% | 236.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.30 | $2.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $256.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $273.0M | $-140.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $670.5M | $269.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $390.5M | $274.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $351.0M | $241.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $250.4M | $-66.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $551.3M | $229.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $318.4M | $240.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $81.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.4M | $81.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.9M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.9M | $16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.6M | $12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.5M | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.5M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.7M | $10.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.3% | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.6% | 13.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.9% | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.5% | 14.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.9% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | 9.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.6% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.2% | 7.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 31.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | -58.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.0% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | -8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.2% | 4.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.03 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.30 | $2.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.70 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.65 | $0.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.62 | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.32 | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.59 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.76 | $0.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $211.7M | $30.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $793.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.8B | $705.6M |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $30.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $211.7M | $30.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $379.2M | $33.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.2M | $30.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $174.3M | $32.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $132.0M | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $481.2M | $26.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $359.2M | $35.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $793.2M | $469.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $802.7M | $407.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $872.8M | $424.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $872.5M | $434.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $806.8M | $398.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $706.4M | $409.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $706.1M | $427.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $705.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $705.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $725.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $715.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $686.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $667.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $682.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $675.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.44× | 0.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.45× | 0.56× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | 0.59× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.53× | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.50× | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.44× | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.47× | 0.63× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-157.0M | $117.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-157.1M | $36.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -57.5% | 14.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 18.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -10.19× | 1.44× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $93.0M | $109.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $117.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-157.0M | $41.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $256.3M | $36.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.8M | $30.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-19.8M | $9.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-450.0M | $27.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.2M | $22.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-61.7M | $18.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $36.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-157.1M | $36.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.6M | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.0M | $13.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.5M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $118.4M | $10.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-62.3M | $7.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -57.5% | -26.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.1% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.8% | -1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -18.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.5% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -19.6% | 3.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 18.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | -22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 4.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q4 25 | -10.19× | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 3.92× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.48× | 1.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.63× | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.27× | 4.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.46× | 8.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.59× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FOR
| D.R.Horton Inc. | $183.8M | 67% |
| Other | $89.2M | 33% |
TRS
Segment breakdown not available.