vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FOX FACTORY HOLDING CORP (FOXF) and Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($420.0M vs $376.4M, roughly 1.1× FOX FACTORY HOLDING CORP). Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 57.0% vs -0.2%, a 57.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.3% vs 4.8%). Over the past eight quarters, FOX FACTORY HOLDING CORP's revenue compounded faster (6.4% CAGR vs 5.0%).
Fox Factory Holding Corp. is an American company best known for their Fox Racing Shox brand of off-road racing suspension components.
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. is a real estate investment trust (REIT) specializing in casino properties, based in Wyomissing, Pennsylvania. It was formed in November 2013 as a corporate spin-off from Penn National Gaming. The company owns 62 casino properties, all of which are leased to other companies.
FOXF vs GLPI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $376.4M | $420.0M |
| Net Profit | $-634.0K | $239.4M |
| Gross Margin | 30.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 79.4% |
| Net Margin | -0.2% | 57.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.8% | 6.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -113.3% | 40.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $420.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $376.4M | $407.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.9M | $397.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $355.0M | $394.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $352.8M | $395.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $389.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $359.1M | $385.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $348.5M | $380.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $239.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-634.0K | $275.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7M | $241.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-259.7M | $151.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-141.0K | $165.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $223.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8M | $184.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4M | $208.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 79.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 89.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -70.6% | 61.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 65.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 79.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 70.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 77.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 57.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.2% | 67.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | 60.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -73.1% | 38.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.0% | 41.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 57.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 47.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 54.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.02 | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.07 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.23 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.79 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.11 | $0.67 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $0.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $274.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $536.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $956.0M | $5.0B |
| Total Assets | $2.0B | $13.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.56× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $274.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $560.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $560.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $560.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $536.7M | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $541.8M | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $546.9M | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $552.1M | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $558.4M | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $564.1M | $6.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $956.0M | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $958.7M | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $939.9M | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $4.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $13.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $12.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $12.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $12.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $12.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $12.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $11.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.56× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.57× | 1.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.58× | 1.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.47× | 1.74× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.47× | 1.60× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $85.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.8M | $240.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $680.0K | $293.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.7M | $252.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.1M | $270.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.7M | $252.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.6M | $183.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.5M | $272.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.8M | $239.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2M | $261.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | $245.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 46.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.8% | 69.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.8% | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 275.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 67.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 64.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.41× | 1.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.94× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.94× | 1.46× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.94× | 1.21× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FOXF
| Specialty Sports Group | $132.7M | 35% |
| Powered Vehicles Group | $125.9M | 33% |
| Aftermarket Applications Group | $117.8M | 31% |
GLPI
Segment breakdown not available.