vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FOX FACTORY HOLDING CORP (FOXF) and T1 Energy Inc. (TE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FOX FACTORY HOLDING CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($361.1M vs $210.5M, roughly 1.7× T1 Energy Inc.).
Fox Factory Holding Corp. is an American company best known for their Fox Racing Shox brand of off-road racing suspension components.
Sony Energy Devices Corporation , is a Japanese multinational company specializing in a variety of areas in the energy industry, and is a wholly owned subsidiary and part of the Devices Group of Sony. The company was established in February 1975 in Fukushima, Japan.
FOXF vs TE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2027 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $361.1M | $210.5M |
| Net Profit | — | $-130.6M |
| Gross Margin | 28.3% | 10.0% |
| Operating Margin | -13.0% | -45.0% |
| Net Margin | — | -62.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -375.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-6.86 | $-0.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 26 | $361.1M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $368.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $376.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.9M | $210.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $355.0M | $132.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $352.8M | $53.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $359.1M | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | $348.5M | $0 |
| Q4 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $-15.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-634.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7M | $-130.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-259.7M | $-31.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-141.0K | $-16.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8M | $-27.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4M | $-27.0M |
| Q4 26 | 28.3% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.2% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.9% | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.9% | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.8% | — |
| Q4 26 | -13.0% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 72.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | -45.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -70.6% | -22.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | -44.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | — |
| Q4 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | -4.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | -62.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -73.1% | -24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.0% | -30.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | — |
| Q4 26 | $-6.86 | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $-0.36 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.07 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.23 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.11 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $-0.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $58.0M | $34.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $26.9M | $547.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $670.2M | $96.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.04× | 5.65× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 26 | $58.0M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $53.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.7M | $48.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $181.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $219.6M |
| Q4 26 | $26.9M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $26.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $536.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $541.8M | $547.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $546.9M | $591.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $552.1M | $603.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $558.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $564.1M | — |
| Q4 26 | $670.2M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $658.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $956.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $958.7M | $96.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $939.9M | $183.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $201.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $538.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $561.6M |
| Q4 26 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $615.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $644.4M |
| Q4 26 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.57× | 5.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.58× | 3.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | 2.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.47× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $60.9M | $63.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $55.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 26.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-42.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 26 | $60.9M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.8M | $63.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $680.0K | $33.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.7M | $-44.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.1M | $-28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.7M | $-28.0M |
| Q4 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.6M | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.5M | $10.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.8M | $-74.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2M | $-34.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | $-35.6M |
| Q4 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 26.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.8% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.8% | -138.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | — |
| Q4 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 54.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | — |
| Q4 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.41× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.94× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.94× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FOXF
| Aftermarket Applications Group | $126.2M | 35% |
| Specialty Sports Group | $118.2M | 33% |
| Powered Vehicles Group | $116.7M | 32% |
TE
| Related Party | $120.1M | 57% |
| Nonrelated Party | $90.4M | 43% |
