vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) and i-80 Gold Corp. (IAUX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
i-80 Gold Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($21.3M vs $13.6M, roughly 1.6× Five Point Holdings, LLC). Five Point Holdings, LLC runs the higher net margin — -16.4% vs -401.9%, a 385.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Five Point Holdings, LLC is a leading U.S. real estate development company that focuses on planning and constructing large-scale master-planned mixed-use communities in high-demand markets across California. Its projects integrate residential housing, commercial office spaces, retail outlets, public amenities and recreational facilities to build vibrant, sustainable living and working environments for local populations.
i-80 Gold Corp is a mineral exploration and development firm focused on gold and silver asset operations in Nevada, US. It advances high-potential mining projects, using responsible extraction practices to deliver precious metals to global industrial and investment markets.
FPH vs IAUX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.6M | $21.3M |
| Net Profit | $-2.2M | $-85.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 22.0% |
| Operating Margin | -43.5% | -291.6% |
| Net Margin | -16.4% | -401.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.2% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -109.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $13.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $75.9M | $21.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.5M | $32.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $27.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.2M | $14.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.0M | $11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.2M | $7.2M |
| Q1 26 | $-2.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $58.7M | $-85.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.1M | $-41.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $-30.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $-41.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8M | $-43.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7M | $-41.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -42.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -171.4% |
| Q1 26 | -43.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 89.0% | -291.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -86.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -67.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -112.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 87.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 83.6% | -210.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 86.1% | -435.2% |
| Q1 26 | -16.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 77.3% | -401.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 156.2% | -130.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.4% | -108.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 177.0% | -293.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.0% | -374.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.8% | -570.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $332.6M | $63.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $174.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $346.8M |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $703.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.50× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $332.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $425.5M | $63.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $351.1M | $102.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $456.6M | $133.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $528.3M | $13.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $430.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $224.5M | $21.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $217.4M | $47.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $174.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $175.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $175.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $197.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $346.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $423.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $463.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $318.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $346.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $377.2M |
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $703.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $756.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $782.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $659.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-44.5M | $-34.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-39.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -184.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 23.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-93.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-44.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.2M | $-34.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.4M | $-15.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-71.6M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.7M | $-22.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-18.0M | $-23.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-23.2M | $-24.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.0M | $-39.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-18.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-71.7M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.7M | $-23.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-18.2M | $-23.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-23.6M | $-25.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 138.4% | -184.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -57.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -959.3% | -44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 430.9% | -164.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 72.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -106.9% | -206.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -46.1% | -349.1% |
| Q1 26 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 7.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.79× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.92× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.58× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.96× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.77× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.58× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FPH
Segment breakdown not available.
IAUX
| Granite Creek Mining Company | $20.3M | 95% |
| Ruby Hill Mining Company LLC | $991.0K | 5% |
| Lone Tree Minning Company | $3.0K | 0% |
