vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FRANKLIN FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP (FRAF) and STANDARD BIOTOOLS INC. (LAB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FRANKLIN FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.3M vs $19.6M, roughly 1.2× STANDARD BIOTOOLS INC.). FRANKLIN FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP runs the higher net margin — 25.9% vs -177.4%, a 203.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FRANKLIN FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (51.5% vs -11.5%). Over the past eight quarters, FRANKLIN FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP's revenue compounded faster (14.6% CAGR vs -12.2%).
Franklin Financial Services Corp (Pennsylvania) is a U.S. regional bank holding company primarily operating across Pennsylvania. It provides comprehensive retail and commercial banking services, including deposit products, personal and business loans, mortgage financing, and wealth management solutions for individual consumers, small local businesses and regional institutional clients.
Standard BioTools Inc., previously known as Fluidigm Corp., is an American life science tools company that offers analytical mass cytometry systems for flow cytometry and tissue imaging, along with associated assays and reagents, as well as an automated genomic analysis instrument and a variety of microfluidic arrays, or integrated fluidic circuits (IFCs), and consumables with fully kitted reagents. Custom assays and services are available with all systems and applications.
FRAF vs LAB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.3M | $19.6M |
| Net Profit | $6.0M | $-34.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 48.5% |
| Operating Margin | 32.1% | -168.5% |
| Net Margin | 25.9% | -177.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 51.5% | -11.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1140.7% | -28.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.35 | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $23.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.0M | $19.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.3M | $21.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.2M | $40.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.5M | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.6M | $22.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.7M | $45.5M |
| Q4 25 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4M | $-34.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9M | $-33.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9M | $-26.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $487.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2M | $-26.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | $-45.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4M | $-32.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 48.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 54.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 46.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 53.1% |
| Q4 25 | 32.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.9% | -168.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.8% | -118.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.9% | -80.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.2% | -120.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | -134.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.6% | -132.2% |
| Q4 25 | 25.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.3% | -177.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.4% | -153.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.4% | -63.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.6% | -122.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.3% | -203.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.9% | -70.6% |
| Q4 25 | $1.35 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.19 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.32 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.88 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.95 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.66 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.77 | $-0.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $127.7M | $129.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $175.2M | $399.7M |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $539.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $127.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $188.1M | $129.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.8M | $158.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $225.0M | $150.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $203.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $236.3M | $210.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $179.7M | $269.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $182.6M | $287.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $55.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $55.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $55.0M |
| Q4 25 | $175.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $166.3M | $399.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $157.4M | $424.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $151.4M | $454.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $144.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $149.9M | $489.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $136.8M | $510.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $134.2M | $577.3M |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $539.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $557.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $579.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $681.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $708.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $777.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.10× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $25.4M | $-22.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-23.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -118.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.21× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-111.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $25.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3M | $-22.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1M | $-20.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.8M | $-30.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8M | $-27.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | $-39.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.3M | $-62.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-23.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-22.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-35.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-30.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-41.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-63.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -118.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -103.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -86.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -136.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -182.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -138.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | 4.21× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.55× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.87× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.25× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.67× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.80× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.17× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FRAF
Segment breakdown not available.
LAB
| Consumables | $8.7M | 45% |
| Services And Other Revenue | $5.8M | 29% |
| Instruments | $5.1M | 26% |
