vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FRIEDMAN INDUSTRIES INC (FRD) and Rocket Lab Corp (RKLB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Rocket Lab Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($179.7M vs $168.0M, roughly 1.1× FRIEDMAN INDUSTRIES INC). FRIEDMAN INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 1.8% vs -29.5%, a 31.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FRIEDMAN INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (78.6% vs 35.7%). FRIEDMAN INDUSTRIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-6.3M vs $-114.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Rocket Lab Corp's revenue compounded faster (39.2% CAGR vs 13.3%).
Hellman & Friedman (H&F) is an American private equity firm founded in 1984 by Warren Hellman and Tully Friedman that makes investments primarily through leveraged buyouts as well as growth capital investments. It has focused its efforts on several core target industries including media, financial services, professional services and information services.
Rocket Lab Corporation is a publicly traded aerospace manufacturer and launch service provider. Its Electron orbital rocket launches small satellites and has successfully completed over 75 missions as of January 2026, making it the most prolific small-lift launch vehicle in operation globally. A suborbital variant of Electron, called HASTE, was developed as a testbed to advance hypersonic technology development, while the next-generation reusable Neutron medium-lift launch vehicle is in devel...
FRD vs RKLB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $168.0M | $179.7M |
| Net Profit | $3.0M | $-52.9M |
| Gross Margin | 2.3% | 38.0% |
| Operating Margin | 2.3% | -28.4% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | -29.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 78.6% | 35.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 364.1% | -1.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.43 | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | $179.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $152.4M | $155.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $134.8M | $144.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $122.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.1M | $132.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $106.8M | $104.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $114.6M | $106.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $92.8M |
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $-52.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2M | $-18.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0M | $-66.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-60.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.2M | $-52.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-675.0K | $-51.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | $-41.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-44.3M |
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | 38.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 37.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 32.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 28.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.2% | 26.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.2% | 25.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 26.1% |
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | -28.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | -38.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | -41.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -48.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.3% | -38.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.2% | -49.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.2% | -40.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -46.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | -29.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | -11.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | -46.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -49.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.2% | -39.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.6% | -49.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | -39.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -47.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.43 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.32 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.71 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.17 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.37 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.0M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $152.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $142.2M | $1.7B |
| Total Assets | $311.9M | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.09× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6M | $976.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $688.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $428.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | $419.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | $442.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1M | $496.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $492.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $152.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $347.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $346.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $345.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $345.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $61.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $64.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $66.8M |
| Q4 25 | $142.2M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $137.3M | $688.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $431.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.3M | $382.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $128.8M | $419.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $129.7M | $455.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $478.9M |
| Q4 25 | $311.9M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $311.3M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $219.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $210.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $209.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $222.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.80× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.14× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.7M | $-64.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-6.3M | $-114.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.8% | -63.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | 27.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -1.56× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-321.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-4.7M | $-64.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $434.0K | $-23.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.5M | $-23.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-54.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-30.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.1M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-6.3M | $-114.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.0M | $-69.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.7M | $-55.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-82.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-23.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-41.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.1M | $-28.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-21.8M |
| Q4 25 | -3.8% | -63.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.3% | -44.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | -38.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -67.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -18.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -40.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.2% | -26.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -23.5% |
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 29.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 14.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.7% |
| Q4 25 | -1.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.08× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.36× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FRD
| Prime Coil | $152.0M | 90% |
| Manufactured Pipe | $14.9M | 9% |
| Customer Owned | $1.1M | 1% |
RKLB
| Products | $94.0M | 52% |
| Transferred Over Time | $87.3M | 49% |
