vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JFrog Ltd (FROG) and TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC (TR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($196.3M vs $145.3M, roughly 1.4× JFrog Ltd). TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 14.7% vs -10.5%, a 25.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JFrog Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.2% vs 1.5%). TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($61.0M vs $49.9M). Over the past eight quarters, JFrog Ltd's revenue compounded faster (20.4% CAGR vs 13.2%).
JFrog Ltd is a global DevOps technology provider that delivers end-to-end software release, artifact management, and security solutions. It serves clients across tech, finance, retail, and manufacturing sectors, helping teams streamline development and delivery workflows for cloud, on-premises, and hybrid infrastructure.
Tootsie Roll Industries is an American manufacturer of confectionery based in Chicago, Illinois. Its best-known products include the namesake Tootsie Rolls and Tootsie Pops. Tootsie Roll Industries currently markets its brands internationally in Canada, Mexico, and over 75 other countries.
FROG vs TR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $145.3M | $196.3M |
| Net Profit | $-15.2M | $28.8M |
| Gross Margin | 77.9% | 35.7% |
| Operating Margin | -14.7% | 17.0% |
| Net Margin | -10.5% | 14.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 25.2% | 1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 34.4% | 27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.13 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $145.3M | $196.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $136.9M | $232.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $127.2M | $155.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $122.4M | $148.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.1M | $193.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $109.1M | $225.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $103.0M | $150.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $100.3M | $153.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.2M | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-16.4M | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-21.7M | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-18.5M | $18.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-23.2M | $22.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.9M | $32.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.3M | $15.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.8M | $15.8M |
| Q4 25 | 77.9% | 35.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 77.4% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.3% | 36.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 75.3% | 35.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.4% | 39.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 75.0% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 78.8% | 33.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 79.5% | 32.7% |
| Q4 25 | -14.7% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -15.8% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -18.8% | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -21.9% | 20.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -27.4% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.6% | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.6% | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | -10.5% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.0% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.0% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.1% | 12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.0% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -21.0% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.9% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.8% | 10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.19 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.21 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.21 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $704.4M | $176.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $887.4M | $941.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $704.4M | $176.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $651.1M | $119.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $611.7M | $170.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $563.5M | $176.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $522.0M | $194.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $467.8M | $163.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $591.3M | $131.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $579.6M | $159.4M |
| Q4 25 | $887.4M | $941.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $859.4M | $918.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $826.5M | $893.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $800.0M | $879.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $773.5M | $870.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $756.2M | $870.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $721.4M | $841.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $707.8M | $834.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $997.1M | $1.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $50.7M | $73.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $49.9M | $61.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 34.3% | 31.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 6.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $142.3M | $96.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $50.7M | $73.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.2M | $62.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.1M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.8M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.1M | $68.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.6M | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $-12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5M | $21.4M |
| Q4 25 | $49.9M | $61.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.8M | $50.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.5M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.1M | $750.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $48.5M | $64.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.7M | $55.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $-16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.6M | $16.9M |
| Q4 25 | 34.3% | 31.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.9% | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.8% | 33.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | 24.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.5% | -11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.6% | 11.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.74× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.49× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.35× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FROG
Segment breakdown not available.
TR
| Products | $194.3M | 99% |
| Rental And Royalty | $1.9M | 1% |
