vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) and Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NMM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($327.6M vs $228.6M, roughly 1.4× Freshworks Inc.). Navios Maritime Partners L.P. runs the higher net margin — 21.4% vs -2.1%, a 23.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Freshworks Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.5% vs -4.3%).
Freshworks Inc. is a cloud-based software-as-a-service company, founded in 2010 in Chennai, India. The company provides cloud-based tools for customer relationship management (CRM), IT service management (ITSM), and e-commerce marketing.
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. is a multinational, vertically integrated seaborne shipping and logistics company focused on the transport and transshipment of drybulk commodities including iron ore, coal and grain.
FRSH vs NMM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $228.6M | $327.6M |
| Net Profit | $-4.8M | $69.9M |
| Gross Margin | 84.8% | 90.5% |
| Operating Margin | 11.6% | — |
| Net Margin | -2.1% | 21.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 16.5% | -4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -268.9% | -31.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $228.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $222.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $215.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $204.7M | $327.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $196.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $194.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $186.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $174.1M | $342.2M |
| Q1 26 | $-4.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $191.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.7M | $69.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-30.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-20.2M | $101.5M |
| Q1 26 | 84.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 85.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 84.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 84.8% | 90.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 84.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 84.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 84.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 83.8% | 88.3% |
| Q1 26 | 11.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -20.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -25.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | -2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 86.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.6% | 29.7% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.66 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $548.2M | $377.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | — |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $5.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $548.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $781.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $813.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $926.2M | $377.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $995.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $272.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $851.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $984.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $5.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $5.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $62.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $62.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $62.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $60.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
