vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC (CBSH) and Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NMM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($475.7M vs $327.6M, roughly 1.5× Navios Maritime Partners L.P.). COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 21.4%, a 8.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.1% vs -4.3%).
Commerce Bancshares, Inc. is a regional bank holding company headquartered in Missouri, with principal offices in Kansas City and St. Louis. It is the corporate parent of Commerce Bank, which offers a diversified line of financial services, including business and personal banking, wealth management and investments through its affiliated companies.
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. is a multinational, vertically integrated seaborne shipping and logistics company focused on the transport and transshipment of drybulk commodities including iron ore, coal and grain.
CBSH vs NMM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $475.7M | $327.6M |
| Net Profit | $141.6M | $69.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 90.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 29.8% | 21.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.1% | -4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 0.7% | -31.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.96 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $475.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $449.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $441.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $445.8M | $327.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $428.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $422.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $421.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $414.5M | $342.2M |
| Q1 26 | $141.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.5M | $69.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $138.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $139.6M | $101.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 90.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 88.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.2% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.7% | 29.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.96 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.86 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.06 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.14 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.98 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.83 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.01 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.03 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $377.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.3B | — |
| Total Assets | $35.7B | $5.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $377.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $272.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $35.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.3B | $5.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.6B | $5.3B |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
